5 Comments

  1. Posted February 13, 2007 at 4:36 pm by Chris Garrett | Permalink

    The hope would be Microsoft would have no excuse for not understanding the format then. It has to be said the same accusation has been levelled at photoshop too.

  2. Posted February 11, 2007 at 11:00 pm by Chris | Permalink

    Another good reason not to update (yet).

  3. Posted February 12, 2007 at 4:46 am by Jeremey | Permalink

    Are you kidding? :) If camera manufacturers agreed on a format, Microsoft’s obliterating of the metadata in THAT format would be OK?

    I’m not all that enamored of a standard format. Standard formats are often the lowest common denominator (though certainly not always). It’s great in principal and if they did it Right ™, that would be nice.

    But Vista trampling metadata is unrelated to the lack of a standard format.

  4. Posted March 7, 2007 at 5:53 pm by Gary Thom | Permalink

    Actually, given the fact that Nikon provided the Codec (you even download it and the update from Nikon’s own site) that Vista uses to read and write the meta-data / EXIF information. You could even place the blame at Nikon’s feet..

    I’ve been using Vista for about 4 months (MSDN), the only issue I’ve had photographically speaking is that neither Adobe Essentials nor DXO run under Vista. Capture NX, Photoshop, Lightroom etc. all work great.

  5. Posted March 8, 2007 at 6:10 pm by Richard McEnery | Permalink

    You may want to rephrase your headline. Using the Photo Info tool has NOTHING to do with Vista. It also runs on WinXP. You will only be affected if you try to update metadata using the tool, REGARDLESS of whether it is Vista or XP.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>