<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Problem With RAW</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dslrblog.com/the-problem-with-raw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dslrblog.com/the-problem-with-raw/</link>
	<description>the stories behind the images</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 23:28:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Koontz</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/the-problem-with-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-5787</link>
		<dc:creator>John Koontz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5787</guid>
		<description>&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;It&#039;s slow. It requires far more post-processing.&lt;/li&gt; 
&lt;li&gt;It&#039;s big. Less pics fit on a memory card and they take longer to write.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It&#039;s proprietary.  There isn&#039;t a standard accross the industry.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Support in 3rd party apps always lags.  Because it&#039;s proprietary.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It&#039;s not a final output.  Very few places will print from RAW.  Vey few contests/magazines/photo contests will accept a RAW submission.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;

There are wonderful uses for RAW, but many photographers think they HAVE to use it.  Simply not true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>It&#8217;s slow. It requires far more post-processing.</li>
<li>It&#8217;s big. Less pics fit on a memory card and they take longer to write.</li>
<li>It&#8217;s proprietary.  There isn&#8217;t a standard accross the industry.</li>
<li>Support in 3rd party apps always lags.  Because it&#8217;s proprietary.</li>
<li>It&#8217;s not a final output.  Very few places will print from RAW.  Vey few contests/magazines/photo contests will accept a RAW submission.</li>
</ul>
<p>There are wonderful uses for RAW, but many photographers think they HAVE to use it.  Simply not true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkT</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/the-problem-with-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-5788</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5788</guid>
		<description>As alway&#039;s it&#039;s horses for courses and the best option is the one that suits you.  You don&#039;t have to use RAW, if you&#039;re happy with JPEG then great.  However magazines and competitions no longer (See practical photographies photo of the year) accept JPEG only TIFS and to get a high quality TIF you have to output from RAW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As alway&#8217;s it&#8217;s horses for courses and the best option is the one that suits you.  You don&#8217;t have to use RAW, if you&#8217;re happy with JPEG then great.  However magazines and competitions no longer (See practical photographies photo of the year) accept JPEG only TIFS and to get a high quality TIF you have to output from RAW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/the-problem-with-raw/comment-page-1/#comment-5789</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5789</guid>
		<description>Seems quite odd that they only accept tif, strange</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems quite odd that they only accept tif, strange</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

