<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dslrBlog &#187; problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dslrblog.com/tag/problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dslrblog.com</link>
	<description>the stories behind the images</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:45:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo! Silences Rebekka In Photo Theft Outrage</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/yahoo-silences-rebekka-in-photo-theft-outrage/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/yahoo-silences-rebekka-in-photo-theft-outrage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 10:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DSLRBlog Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas Hawk has news of a bizarre decision from Yahoo! over at <a href="http://thomashawk.com/2007/05/flickr-censorship.html">Flickr regarding the theft of Rebekkas work</a> <br /> <blockquote>So what's got me pissed today?  What's got me pissed today is that according to Rebekka, <a href="http://rebekkagudleifs.com/blog/2007/05/15/freedom-of-expression-telling-the-truth/">Flickr</a> has removed her image from their site. That's right. Not only did they remove and kill her image and her *non-violent* words of protest, but they censored each and every one of us who commented on her photograph, who offered support to Rebekka, who shared in her frustration by wiping every single one of our comments off the face of the internet forever.<br /><br />According to Rebekka, Flickr's explanation?<br /><span style="font-style: italic;"><br />“Flickr is not a venue for to you harass, abuse, impersonate, or intimidate others. If we receive a valid complaint about your conduct, we will send you a warning or<br />terminate your account.”</span><br /><br />WTF?!?<br /><br />So a flickr photographer gets ripped off. Dares to complain about it. Has an outpouring of support on the internet over it and Yahoo decides censorship is the way to handle this? This is the worst I've seen from Yahoo yet.</blockquote>Many of us worried when Yahoo! took over Flickr. It seems some of those worries might be well founded.<br /><br />Popular photographers like Thomas and Rebekka are people who built Flickr into the community it is (yes community, not just a picture hosting site). Even if they were not known at all, Yahoo! should be helping them not silencing them. To pour injustice on injustice is .... well, regardless of right and wrong, it's bad for business.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas Hawk has news of a bizarre decision from Yahoo! over at <a href="http://thomashawk.com/2007/05/flickr-censorship.html">Flickr regarding the theft of Rebekkas work</a></p>
<blockquote><p>So what&#8217;s got me pissed today?  What&#8217;s got me pissed today is that according to Rebekka, <a href="http://rebekkagudleifs.com/blog/2007/05/15/freedom-of-expression-telling-the-truth/">Flickr</a> has removed her image from their site. That&#8217;s right. Not only did they remove and kill her image and her *non-violent* words of protest, but they censored each and every one of us who commented on her photograph, who offered support to Rebekka, who shared in her frustration by wiping every single one of our comments off the face of the internet forever.</p>
<p>According to Rebekka, Flickr&#8217;s explanation?<br />
<span style="font-style: italic;"><br />
“Flickr is not a venue for to you harass, abuse, impersonate, or intimidate others. If we receive a valid complaint about your conduct, we will send you a warning or<br />
terminate your account.”</span></p>
<p>WTF?!?</p>
<p>So a flickr photographer gets ripped off. Dares to complain about it. Has an outpouring of support on the internet over it and Yahoo decides censorship is the way to handle this? This is the worst I&#8217;ve seen from Yahoo yet.</p></blockquote>
<p>Many of us worried when Yahoo! took over Flickr. It seems some of those worries might be well founded.</p>
<p>Popular photographers like Thomas and Rebekka are people who built Flickr into the community it is (yes community, not just a picture hosting site). Even if they were not known at all, Yahoo! should be helping them not silencing them. To pour injustice on injustice is &#8230;. well, regardless of right and wrong, it&#8217;s bad for business.<!--break--></p>

				<!-- Social Sharing Toolkit v2.0.4 | http://www.marijnrongen.com/wordpress-plugins/social_sharing_toolkit/ -->
				<div class="mr_social_sharing_wrapper"><span class="mr_social_sharing"><iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?locale=en_US&amp;href=http%3A%2F%2Fdslrblog.com%2Fyahoo-silences-rebekka-in-photo-theft-outrage%2F&amp;layout=box_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=55px&amp;height=61px" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:55px; height:61px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></span><span class="mr_social_sharing"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://dslrblog.com/yahoo-silences-rebekka-in-photo-theft-outrage/" data-count="vertical" data-via="dslrblog" data-text="Yahoo! Silences Rebekka In Photo Theft Outrage">Tweet</a></span><span class="mr_social_sharing"><g:plusone size="tall" href="http://dslrblog.com/yahoo-silences-rebekka-in-photo-theft-outrage/"></g:plusone></span><span class="mr_social_sharing"><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/share/link?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdslrblog.com%2Fyahoo-silences-rebekka-in-photo-theft-outrage%2F&amp;name=Yahoo%21+Silences+Rebekka+In+Photo+Theft+Outrage" target="_blank" class="mr_social_sharing_popup_link"><img src="http://dslrblog.com/wp-content/plugins/social-sharing-toolkit/images/buttons/tumblr.png" alt="Share on Tumblr" title="Share on Tumblr"/></a></span><span class="mr_social_sharing"><a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdslrblog.com%2Fyahoo-silences-rebekka-in-photo-theft-outrage%2F&amp;title=Yahoo%21+Silences+Rebekka+In+Photo+Theft+Outrage" target="_blank" class="mr_social_sharing_popup_link"><img src="http://dslrblog.com/wp-content/plugins/social-sharing-toolkit/images/buttons/stumbleupon.png" alt="Submit to StumbleUpon" title="Submit to StumbleUpon"/></a></span><span class="mr_social_sharing"><a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdslrblog.com%2Fyahoo-silences-rebekka-in-photo-theft-outrage%2F&amp;title=Yahoo%21+Silences+Rebekka+In+Photo+Theft+Outrage" target="_blank" class="mr_social_sharing_popup_link"><img src="http://dslrblog.com/wp-content/plugins/social-sharing-toolkit/images/buttons/delicious.png" alt="Save on Delicious" title="Save on Delicious"/></a></span></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/yahoo-silences-rebekka-in-photo-theft-outrage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista Considered Harmful to Photographers</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/vista-considered-harmful-to-photographers/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/vista-considered-harmful-to-photographers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DSLRBlog Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Editing and Digital Workflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[formatting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metadata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is it they always say, "Never use version 1". Good advice, particularly when considering upgrading an operating system. I switched to Mac but I still need to have one foot in the Microsoft camp. It turns out <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/software/windows-vista-destroys-photo-metadata-235461.php">Windows Vista Destroys Photo Metadata</a>. This news doesn't add any incentive to upgrade.<blockquote>A bit of bad news about Vista if you're a photographer. Apparently if you tag a photo's metadata in Vista, it destroys other important metadata used by image editing apps such as Photoshop. Microsoft's gotten reports of RAW files generated by Nikon cameras being unreadable after being tagged with Vista or Microsoft's Photo Info tool.</blockquote><br /><br />Now before the anti-Microsoft crowd start foaming at the mouth or the pro-Microsoft guys lynch me, this is not all Microsofts fault. If only the camera manufacturers would produce a standardised format perhaps cockups like this wouldn't happen?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it they always say, &#8220;Never use version 1&#8243;. Good advice, particularly when considering upgrading an operating system. I switched to Mac but I still need to have one foot in the Microsoft camp. It turns out <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/software/windows-vista-destroys-photo-metadata-235461.php">Windows Vista Destroys Photo Metadata</a>. This news doesn&#8217;t add any incentive to upgrade.</p>
<blockquote><p>A bit of bad news about Vista if you&#8217;re a photographer. Apparently if you tag a photo&#8217;s metadata in Vista, it destroys other important metadata used by image editing apps such as Photoshop. Microsoft&#8217;s gotten reports of RAW files generated by Nikon cameras being unreadable after being tagged with Vista or Microsoft&#8217;s Photo Info tool.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now before the anti-Microsoft crowd start foaming at the mouth or the pro-Microsoft guys lynch me, this is not all Microsofts fault. If only the camera manufacturers would produce a standardised format perhaps cockups like this wouldn&#8217;t happen?<br />
<!--break--></p>

				<!-- Social Sharing Toolkit v2.0.4 | http://www.marijnrongen.com/wordpress-plugins/social_sharing_toolkit/ -->
				<div class="mr_social_sharing_wrapper"><span class="mr_social_sharing"><iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?locale=en_US&amp;href=http%3A%2F%2Fdslrblog.com%2Fvista-considered-harmful-to-photographers%2F&amp;layout=box_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=55px&amp;height=61px" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:55px; height:61px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></span><span class="mr_social_sharing"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://dslrblog.com/vista-considered-harmful-to-photographers/" data-count="vertical" data-via="dslrblog" data-text="Vista Considered Harmful to Photographers">Tweet</a></span><span class="mr_social_sharing"><g:plusone size="tall" href="http://dslrblog.com/vista-considered-harmful-to-photographers/"></g:plusone></span><span class="mr_social_sharing"><a href="http://www.tumblr.com/share/link?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdslrblog.com%2Fvista-considered-harmful-to-photographers%2F&amp;name=Vista+Considered+Harmful+to+Photographers" target="_blank" class="mr_social_sharing_popup_link"><img src="http://dslrblog.com/wp-content/plugins/social-sharing-toolkit/images/buttons/tumblr.png" alt="Share on Tumblr" title="Share on Tumblr"/></a></span><span class="mr_social_sharing"><a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdslrblog.com%2Fvista-considered-harmful-to-photographers%2F&amp;title=Vista+Considered+Harmful+to+Photographers" target="_blank" class="mr_social_sharing_popup_link"><img src="http://dslrblog.com/wp-content/plugins/social-sharing-toolkit/images/buttons/stumbleupon.png" alt="Submit to StumbleUpon" title="Submit to StumbleUpon"/></a></span><span class="mr_social_sharing"><a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdslrblog.com%2Fvista-considered-harmful-to-photographers%2F&amp;title=Vista+Considered+Harmful+to+Photographers" target="_blank" class="mr_social_sharing_popup_link"><img src="http://dslrblog.com/wp-content/plugins/social-sharing-toolkit/images/buttons/delicious.png" alt="Save on Delicious" title="Save on Delicious"/></a></span></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/vista-considered-harmful-to-photographers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

