Tag Archives: Photoshop

Adobe Photoshop Elements 5 Announced

Photoshop Elements users might be interested to hear Adobe have upgraded the product. Not wanting to spend the kind of money required for the full CS package I bought Elements 4 and have been reasonably happy with it so far. I had to patch it up to be able to use layer masks in elements, after that it does everything I need I think. The new Elements 5 upgrade seems to be mostly consumer-oriented features as far as I can see, stuff like scrap book style layouts and mapping (as you might expect).

They have added some editing functionality, not sure of the detail as info is patchy right now at the Adobe Site

Make good photos great with superior editing tools. Fine-tune color, brightness, and exposure using new color curves adjustments; create rich black-and-white conversions; easily correct camera lens distortions; and sharpen blurred edges.

Personally I will be looking out for reviews before upgrading, and even then there will need to be something very compelling!

More Photoshop Elements 5 product info here and the press release is here.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Posted in News and Commentary, Photo Editing and Digital Workflow, Product Releases | Also tagged , , , , Leave a comment

Layer Masks in Elements 4.0 – Adding Missing Essential Photoshop Tools to Elements

When I first bought Elements it was after having used the full Photoshop package for a few years. I was assured by whoever I asked that the major features were present. And they are, to a point. It is only when you try to do something and search the help and nearly throw your mouse through the window that you realise that the few important missing bits are really important!

For example, there is only so long before you find yourself searching help on using layer masks in photoshop elements and find that it isn’t there!.

Search no longer! Get yourself over to Elements Tools

Follow the instructions and you will soon find several features missing in elements and wonder why Adobe dropped them when the package can clearly do it …

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Posted in Photo Editing and Digital Workflow | Also tagged , , , 2 Comments

HDR Photography In NY Times

You know the bandwagon is well and truly rolling when the traditional media pick up on it, check out the profile of Flickrite Kris Kros (Joe Dejesus) in the New York Times

H.D.R. is one of many digital darkroom techniques catching the fancy of amateur photographers. With the rising popularity of digital single-lens reflex cameras and more powerful personal computers has come a growing interest in visual experiments. At the same time, software makers like Adobe are increasingly automating many of those processes, including H.D.R. While they may not always be straightforward, tricky digital techniques no longer require months of experience or hours of study.

Fad or not, his pictures can be very very cool. It is well worth spending some time skimming through his photostream. Definitely deserves the attention.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted in News and Commentary, Online Photography Community, Photo Editing and Digital Workflow | Also tagged , 2 Comments

It’s all about the picture

I was just catching up on my blog reading and I came across The Digital Photography Weblog discussing the two camps of digital photographers.

On the one hand, we have by far the vast majority of digital photographers, people who see Photoshop as not only a digital tool, but an integral part of their daily workflow. These are the RAW advocates. They see JPEG as a hindrance to productivity and quality because you can’t make lossless adjustments.

On the other hand, we have people like Ken Rockwell, and a growing number of professional photographers. The argument is that instant review, the ability to take an almost unlimited number of shots of a subject, and the ability to digitally remaster images are making photographers lazy. JPEG tends to be the favored format here because, as the argument goes, you can’t tell the difference in a final printed product between an untouched JPEG and a converted RAW image, and if you get the shot right the first time, you don’t need CameraRAW to cover your mistakes later.

I know we have members and readers here in both camps. While I was for a while in the non-photoshop opinion group I have started to form my own idea of what is important and it isn’t covered by either side of the above debate.

It’s all about the picture!

It doesn’t matter how you create the picture, what does the picture look like? If the finished photograph doesn’t look good, doesn’t move you or interest you in any way it doesn’t matter how “pure” your technique was by anyone’s standard.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted in News and Commentary, Online Photography Community, Photo Editing and Digital Workflow | Also tagged , 2 Comments