Tag Archives: photos

Crop Circle Photographs

Wired is showing a gallery of crop circles in a feature. Some of the designs are really cool.

I say “designs” because a few years back I worked for an agency where we hired some guys to create one for us. All illusions of this being an extra terrestrial phenomenon were shattered there and then. Even more so when so-called experts declared to all that it was real, couldn’t possibly be a fake and that it was exhibiting strange electro magnetic properties!

port80

Here is a quote from my old boss

3 great guys worked for 5 hours on this, or was it geomagnetic water flow like the researchers said? My internet firm port80 commissioned this 250ft diameter formation back in 1999. I still love it.

Remember, the truth is out there … just maybe not what you hope the truth is!

Posted in News and Commentary, Notable Photos | Also tagged , Leave a comment

The War on Photographers

PopPhoto has a great article on photographers falling foul of the police and security guards for taking pictures called The War on Photographers

amateur and professional photographers all over the country are being stopped and harassed with no legal basis. As digital cameras proliferate wildly, so do attempts to restrict what you can shoot and how you can use the picture. And not all attempts to quash photography have to do with national security concerns. Some invoke copyright and trademark protection, others the privacy both of celebrities and ordinary people. But you can fight back. Knowing your rights and restrictions as a photographer is a good first step. When cases reach the point of legal proceedings, they’re usually settled in the photographer’s favor, according to lawyers who have represented photographers in court. However, sometimes your own understanding of the law isn’t enough. According to his suit, when Jim McKinniss told the police officers that he was on public property and thought it was legal to photograph, “One of the officers asked if [I] had heard about September 11 and asserted that, since the terrorist attacks…it was illegal to photograph bridges, airports, and refineries.”

This is a crock. There’s no law in California or anywhere else in the U.S. that prohibits shooting such places from a public locale. You can even photograph inside airports, if you don’t point your camera at security checkpoints.

“These laws just don’t exist,” explains McKinniss’s attorney, Robert Myers, who took his case pro bono. “A law that attempts to prohibit photography from places open to the general public would be unconstitutional.”

The piece features some great, quite scary, stories plus some tips on how to handle the situation if it ever happens to you.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted in News and Commentary, Press Freedom | Also tagged , , , , , , Leave a comment

Photographer Ethics: Should the camera never lie?

Two stories about Newspapers “doctoring” images, one laughable, the other more serious from The Digital Photography Weblog

the Charlotte Observer has sacked a staff photographer for altering the colour of an image to, as he states, “to restore the actual color of the sky”. He said the color was lost when he underexposed the photo to offset the glare of the sun.

OK this is plainly ridiculous, the “truth” of the story was restored by this superficial change, who cares what colour the sky was though really? So either way, an over reaction right? How about this one …

The Miami Herald’s Spanish-language sister paper acknowledged Friday that it manipulated two photos to make it appear that two Cuban police officers were ignoring prostitutes gesturing to a tourist.

In this one the image was intentionally created to show a false impression of Police neglect of the prostitute problem. As far as I can tell this photographer was not sacked.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Posted in Legal Issues, Ethics, Model Releases, News and Commentary, Photo Editing and Digital Workflow, Photography Business | Also tagged , , , , , Leave a comment

Tourist Remover Online Photo Editing Service

This is pretty cool for your holiday pics. You know how annoying it is when you go somewhere full of tourists and every picture has people in the way of the view? With this online photo editing service you can remove those annoying blobs right out of the picture

Tourist Remover

Remove moving objects such as tourists or passing cars from your photos. Take multiple photos from the same scene and the «Tourist Remover» blends them into a composite photo without any interfering elements.

I wonder if this can remove noise too? That’s how they clean up movies by differencing two frames right? I am going to have to give this a go when I finally manage to get out of the house to a populated area …

Posted in News and Commentary, Photo Editing and Digital Workflow | Also tagged , Leave a comment

FlickrInspector

I just saw on Thomas Hawks blog a neat little tool called flickrInspector. This service analyses your Flickr information and shows various fun things like your most popular images, your favourites etc. Of particular interest for me is it shows that I have passed my one-year anniversary with Flickr, I have been a member 367 days today!

Wow, that means I have had my Canon 350D just over a year, I will have to do a retrospective …

  • active since 367 days
  • Photos: 1500
  • average upload rate per day: 4.09
  • first photo uploaded on 15.07.2005

Posted in News and Commentary, Online Photography Community, Random Thoughts | Also tagged Leave a comment

Photographer Ethics – Diana Photograph Controversy

I have just been asked what I think about this kuffufle around the publication of the “Diana death picture

The ‘last photograph’ of Princess Diana taken moments after her fatal car crash has been published by a foreign magazine.

The black and white photograph shows the Princess being given oxygen in the Mercedes at the crash site at a Paris underpass.

Now it is an emotive subject for a lot of people but I can not make my mind up about this. On the one hand it seems in poor taste and is bound to upset people but on the other hand why ought she be treated any differently? Why is it ok to have gratuitous pictures of Iraq conflict victims but not a princess?

Personally I would never have taken it in the first place, let alone been in a position to sell it, Diana or not. I’m not entirely sure there is any good to come from this other than a big payday for the photographer.

What do you think? Would you take and sell this picture or not? Should it be published?

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Posted in Legal Issues, Ethics, Model Releases, News and Commentary, Photography Business | Also tagged , , , 7 Comments