<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dslrBlog &#187; photographing people</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dslrblog.com/tag/photographing-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dslrblog.com</link>
	<description>the stories behind the images</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:34:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Portrait Photography Legal Issues Explored</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/portrait-photography-legal-issues-explored/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/portrait-photography-legal-issues-explored/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DSLRBlog Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues, Ethics, Model Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photographing people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portraits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2006/07/20/legal-issues-taking-pictures-of-people/">Richard Wanderman</a> poses the question of what he can legally do with his photographs of other people, one in particular of the musician Antonio Hart<br /> <blockquote>When I took this picture of Antonio Hart at The Blue Note I posted a question in a technical thread on <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/techtalk/discuss/72157594175029570/">Flickr</a>: could I print and sell this image of Hart without his concent.</blockquote> <blockquote><blockquote>Last night I was at The Blue Note in New York and shot a number of pictures of a famous jazz band, mostly of individual players like this one of Antonio Hart:  Antonio Hart Soloing at The Blue Note  My question for all of you pros and semi-pros is: what can I do and not do with a picture like this?  I know I can post it here. I know I can print it for personal use, but can I sell it? Can I publish it in a magazine?</blockquote></blockquote><br /><br />A good conversation ensues, covering aspects I would not have thought of like what the venue would have to say about it. I also did not realise a press pass is not a silver bullet solution in many cases, just giving you a few extra feet of proximity a lot of the time. It seems, as with pictures of the public, a lot of the decision would come down to "reasonable expectations of privacy"; the dude was on stage at a promoted event open to the public so really shouldn't expect to be invisible, right?<br /><br />Regardless, Richard did the right thing and asked the subject of the photograph his own opinion on the matter.<br /><br />&#160;<br /> <br /><br />Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/photographer" rel="tag">photographer</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/photography" rel="tag">photography</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/law" rel="tag">law</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/news" rel="tag">news</a><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2006/07/20/legal-issues-taking-pictures-of-people/">Richard Wanderman</a> poses the question of what he can legally do with his photographs of other people, one in particular of the musician Antonio Hart</p>
<blockquote><p>When I took this picture of Antonio Hart at The Blue Note I posted a question in a technical thread on <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/techtalk/discuss/72157594175029570/">Flickr</a>: could I print and sell this image of Hart without his consent.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Last night I was at The Blue Note in New York and shot a number of pictures of a famous jazz band, mostly of individual players like this one of Antonio Hart:  Antonio Hart Soloing at The Blue Note  My question for all of you pros and semi-pros is: what can I do and not do with a picture like this?  I know I can post it here. I know I can print it for personal use, but can I sell it? Can I publish it in a magazine?</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>A good conversation ensues, covering aspects I would not have thought of like what the venue would have to say about it. I also did not realise a press pass is not a silver bullet solution in many cases, just giving you a few extra feet of proximity a lot of the time. It seems, as with pictures of the public, a lot of the decision would come down to &#8220;reasonable expectations of privacy&#8221;; the dude was on stage at a promoted event open to the public so really shouldn&#8217;t expect to be invisible, right?</p>
<p>Regardless, Richard did the right thing and asked the subject of the photograph his own opinion on the matter.</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/photographer">photographer</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/photography">photography</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/law">law</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/news">news</a></p>
<p><!--break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/portrait-photography-legal-issues-explored/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

