<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dslrBlog &#187; MS Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dslrblog.com/tag/ms-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dslrblog.com</link>
	<description>the stories behind the images</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:34:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Vista Considered Harmful to Photographers</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/vista-considered-harmful-to-photographers/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/vista-considered-harmful-to-photographers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DSLRBlog Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Editing and Digital Workflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[formatting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metadata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is it they always say, "Never use version 1". Good advice, particularly when considering upgrading an operating system. I switched to Mac but I still need to have one foot in the Microsoft camp. It turns out <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/software/windows-vista-destroys-photo-metadata-235461.php">Windows Vista Destroys Photo Metadata</a>. This news doesn't add any incentive to upgrade.<blockquote>A bit of bad news about Vista if you're a photographer. Apparently if you tag a photo's metadata in Vista, it destroys other important metadata used by image editing apps such as Photoshop. Microsoft's gotten reports of RAW files generated by Nikon cameras being unreadable after being tagged with Vista or Microsoft's Photo Info tool.</blockquote><br /><br />Now before the anti-Microsoft crowd start foaming at the mouth or the pro-Microsoft guys lynch me, this is not all Microsofts fault. If only the camera manufacturers would produce a standardised format perhaps cockups like this wouldn't happen?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it they always say, &#8220;Never use version 1&#8243;. Good advice, particularly when considering upgrading an operating system. I switched to Mac but I still need to have one foot in the Microsoft camp. It turns out <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/software/windows-vista-destroys-photo-metadata-235461.php">Windows Vista Destroys Photo Metadata</a>. This news doesn&#8217;t add any incentive to upgrade.</p>
<blockquote><p>A bit of bad news about Vista if you&#8217;re a photographer. Apparently if you tag a photo&#8217;s metadata in Vista, it destroys other important metadata used by image editing apps such as Photoshop. Microsoft&#8217;s gotten reports of RAW files generated by Nikon cameras being unreadable after being tagged with Vista or Microsoft&#8217;s Photo Info tool.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now before the anti-Microsoft crowd start foaming at the mouth or the pro-Microsoft guys lynch me, this is not all Microsofts fault. If only the camera manufacturers would produce a standardised format perhaps cockups like this wouldn&#8217;t happen?<br />
<!--break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/vista-considered-harmful-to-photographers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

