<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dslrBlog &#187; funny</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dslrblog.com/tag/funny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dslrblog.com</link>
	<description>the stories behind the images</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:34:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Photography Fun With Paper Money</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/photography-fun-with-paper-money/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/photography-fun-with-paper-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DSLRBlog Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pictures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bit of silliness but this looks a lot of fun to try with drunken mates!<br /><br /><a href="http://www.omwo.com/?p=10355"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><img id="image10351" alt="pfund_01.jpg" src="http://www.omwo.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/pfund_01.jpg" /></span></span></a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.omwo.com/?p=10355">» FUN mit Banknoten …</a><br /><br />Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/funny" rel="tag">funny</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/photography" rel="tag">photography</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/links" rel="tag">links</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/news" rel="tag">news</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/pictures" rel="tag">pictures</a><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit of silliness but this looks a lot of fun to try with drunken mates!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.omwo.com/?p=10355"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><img id="image10351" src="http://www.omwo.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/pfund_01.jpg" alt="pfund_01.jpg" /></span></span></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.omwo.com/?p=10355">» FUN mit Banknoten …</a></p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/funny">funny</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/photography">photography</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/links">links</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/news">news</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/pictures">pictures</a><br />
<!--break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/photography-fun-with-paper-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What The Duck &#8211; Comic Strip for Photographers</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/what-the-duck-comic-strip-for-photographers/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/what-the-duck-comic-strip-for-photographers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 08:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DSLRBlog Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic strip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photographers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I originally heard about this from <a href="http://strobist.blogspot.com/2006/08/bits-and-pieces-august-26-2006.html">Strobist</a> but only managed to catch up with it recently. Now on my daily read list (in fact I look forward to this as much as the new Dilbert every day), What The Duck is a great comic strip for photographers.<br /><br /><a href="http://sweetjelly.com/blog/comments.php?id=888_0_1_0_C"><img src="http://img485.imageshack.us/img485/1756/wtd36ep3.gif" /></a><br /><br />The <a href="http://sweetjelly.com/blog">blog the strip lives in</a> is for a band called Sweet Jelly, unfortunately right now that is the only place to see them. Someone needs to syndicate this guy!<br />
<p>
<b>Added:</b> WTD now has <a href="http://whattheduck.net/">its own blog</a> - sweet!

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I originally heard about this from <a href="http://strobist.blogspot.com/2006/08/bits-and-pieces-august-26-2006.html">Strobist</a> but only managed to catch up with it recently. Now on my daily read list (in fact I look forward to this as much as the new Dilbert every day), What The Duck is a great comic strip for photographers.</p>
<p><a href="http://sweetjelly.com/blog/comments.php?id=888_0_1_0_C"><img src="http://img485.imageshack.us/img485/1756/wtd36ep3.gif" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>The <a href="http://sweetjelly.com/blog">blog the strip lives in</a> is for a band called Sweet Jelly, unfortunately right now that is the only place to see them. Someone needs to syndicate this guy!</p>
<p><strong>Added:</strong> WTD now has <a href="http://whattheduck.net/">its own blog</a> &#8211; sweet!</p>
<p><!--break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/what-the-duck-comic-strip-for-photographers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cool Star Trek Motivational Posters</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/cool-star-trek-motivational-posters/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/cool-star-trek-motivational-posters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DSLRBlog Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notable Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a brief interlude for some geeky giggles, it's Star Trek motivational posters people!<br /><br /><img src="http://echosphere.net/star_trek_insp/insp_captkirk_preview.jpg" height="318" width="432" /><br /><br /><img src="http://echosphere.net/star_trek_insp/insp_expendability_preview.jpg" height="318" width="432" /><br /><br />More to see <a href="http://echosphere.net/star_trek_insp/star_trek_insp.html">over here</a>, now back to your regular scheduled programming ...<br /><br /><br />Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/star" rel="tag">star</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/trek" rel="tag">trek</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/posters" rel="tag">posters</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/pictures" rel="tag">pictures</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/funny" rel="tag">funny</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/photography" rel="tag">photography</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/news" rel="tag">news</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a brief interlude for some geeky giggles, it&#8217;s Star Trek motivational posters people!</p>
<p><img src="http://echosphere.net/star_trek_insp/insp_captkirk_preview.jpg" alt="" width="432" height="318" /></p>
<p><img src="http://echosphere.net/star_trek_insp/insp_expendability_preview.jpg" alt="" width="432" height="318" /></p>
<p>More to see <a href="http://echosphere.net/star_trek_insp/star_trek_insp.html">over here</a>, now back to your regular scheduled programming &#8230;</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/star">star</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/trek">trek</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/posters">posters</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/pictures">pictures</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/funny">funny</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/photography">photography</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/news">news</a><!--break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/cool-star-trek-motivational-posters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deleteme Duped</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/deleteme-duped/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/deleteme-duped/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DSLRBlog Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is pretty funny, <a href="http://theonlinephotographer.blogspot.com/2006/06/cartier-bresson-booted-from-flickr.html">Cartier-Bresson Booted from Flickr</a> <br /> <blockquote>&#160;Here is a real life example of the kind of criticism Mike is mocking here. The "deleteme" group on Flickr is just that—people make comments and vote to keep or delete a picture from the group pool. This lends itself to art by committee, with hilarious results such as <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/andrerabelo/70458366">Mario's Bike</a> on Flickr.</blockquote><br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_Cartier-Bresson">Henri Cartier-Bresson</a> might be many a photographers hero but he certainly didn't get any breaks from the Flickr Deleteme group. <br /><br />Humour value aside though I think it raises an interesting point, why <i>should</i> a famous artist be given any special treatment over a nobody? Everyone is allowed their opinion even if that opinion goes against historical or popular opinion. Does a number one mean a song is better than had it not achieved the top 40? Just because a critic tells you to go see a movie does that movie suck any less? Of course the reverse it also true; just because someone else finds something wrong in a work of art does not make it any less art.<br /><br />My own efforts at criticism are probably no better or worse than those in that thread, although I do lean toward praise rather than negative and lead with how a picture makes me feel rather than an appreciation of technical merit. I don't see there being any real answers to this. There should be nobody in art above criticism, even if the criticism is of the facile quality of deleteme. <br /><br />What do you think?<br /><br /><br /><br /><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/flickr" rel="tag">flickr</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/funny" rel="tag">funny</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/photography" rel="tag">photography</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/art" rel="tag">art</a><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pretty funny, <a href="http://theonlinephotographer.blogspot.com/2006/06/cartier-bresson-booted-from-flickr.html">Cartier-Bresson Booted from Flickr</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Here is a real life example of the kind of criticism Mike is mocking here. The &#8220;deleteme&#8221; group on Flickr is just that—people make comments and vote to keep or delete a picture from the group pool. This lends itself to art by committee, with hilarious results such as <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/andrerabelo/70458366">Mario&#8217;s Bike</a> on Flickr.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_Cartier-Bresson">Henri Cartier-Bresson</a> might be many a photographer&#8217;s hero but he certainly didn&#8217;t get any breaks from the Flickr Deleteme group.</p>
<p>Humour value aside though I think it raises an interesting point, why <em>should</em> a famous artist be given any special treatment over a nobody? Everyone is allowed their opinion even if that opinion goes against historical or popular opinion. Does a number one mean a song is better than had it not achieved the top 40? Just because a critic tells you to go see a movie does that movie suck any less? Of course the reverse it also true; just because someone else finds something wrong in a work of art does not make it any less art.</p>
<p>My own efforts at criticism are probably no better or worse than those in that thread, although I do lean toward praise rather than negative and lead with how a picture makes me feel rather than an appreciation of technical merit. I don&#8217;t see there being any real answers to this. There should be nobody in art above criticism, even if the criticism is of the facile quality of deleteme.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<p><a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/flickr">flickr</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/funny">funny</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/photography">photography</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/art">art</a></p>
<p><!--break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/deleteme-duped/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

