<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dslrBlog &#187; critiques</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dslrblog.com/tag/critiques/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dslrblog.com</link>
	<description>the stories behind the images</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:34:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Making versus Taking Photographs</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/making-versus-taking-photographs/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/making-versus-taking-photographs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DSLRBlog Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notable Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photographers in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photographs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techniques]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p/>
What is the difference between <i>making </i>a photograph and <i>taking </i>one? It seems some photographers do not like the idea that an artist might stage a scene before capturing it, like the genre should be about recording what is there rather than "creating".<br />

 <p><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5157819">NPR : Gregory Crewdson's Photo Alchemy</a> <br /> <blockquote>Gregory Crewdson doesn't so much take pictures as make them. Some critics say the photographer and artist is reinventing the genre by using film techniques to stage pictures.</blockquote><br /><a href="http://www.npr.org/programs/day/features/2006/jan/crewdson/blurb200_lg.jpg"><img src="http://dslrblog.com/files/making1.jpg" /></a><a href="http://www.npr.org/programs/day/features/2006/jan/crewdson/macy_lg.jpg"><img src="http://dslrblog.com/files/making2.jpg" /></a><a href="http://www.npr.org/programs/day/features/2006/jan/crewdson/fire_lg.jpg"><img src="http://dslrblog.com/files/making3.jpg" /></a><p />

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the difference between <em>making </em>a photograph and <em>taking </em>one? It seems some photographers do not like the idea that an artist might stage a scene before capturing it, like the genre should be about recording what is there rather than &#8220;creating&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5157819">NPR : Gregory Crewdson&#8217;s Photo Alchemy</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Gregory Crewdson doesn&#8217;t so much take pictures as make them. Some critics say the photographer and artist is reinventing the genre by using film techniques to stage pictures.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.npr.org/programs/day/features/2006/jan/crewdson/blurb200_lg.jpg"><img src="http://dslrblog.com/files/making1.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.npr.org/programs/day/features/2006/jan/crewdson/macy_lg.jpg"><img src="http://dslrblog.com/files/making2.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://www.npr.org/programs/day/features/2006/jan/crewdson/fire_lg.jpg"><img src="http://dslrblog.com/files/making3.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><!--break--></p>
<p>I think the idea is fascinating and so obvious I can&#8217;t believe it is a new idea. Why is it ok for a cinematographer to do this and not a photographer? Where is the law that &#8220;photographs <em>shouldn</em>&#8216;<em>t</em> lie&#8221;?</p>
<p>I have to agree with this post from <a href="http://paintedraven.blogspot.com/2006/01/reinventing-photography-or-not.html">Painted Raven</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Some of the earliest photographs were staged, and the idea of ‘staging’ a picture has always been around, and part of photography to some degree… As for photos leaving unanswered questions? Do we ever know the full story behind a photo? While the photos are interesting, and it’s nice to see the arts in the public eye…</p></blockquote>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/making-versus-taking-photographs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

