<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: President Obama&#8217;s Flickr Account</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dslrblog.com/president-obamas-flickr-account/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dslrblog.com/president-obamas-flickr-account/</link>
	<description>the stories behind the images</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: photophan</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/president-obamas-flickr-account/comment-page-1/#comment-7177</link>
		<dc:creator>photophan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslrblog.com/president-obamas-flickr-account/#comment-7177</guid>
		<description>You mean President-elect. Two more months until he is President. Big difference.
The photo&#039;s are interesting but also very measured and I&#039;m sure only allowed to be posted once they were approved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean President-elect. Two more months until he is President. Big difference.<br />
The photo&#8217;s are interesting but also very measured and I&#8217;m sure only allowed to be posted once they were approved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/president-obamas-flickr-account/comment-page-1/#comment-7109</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslrblog.com/president-obamas-flickr-account/#comment-7109</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure that photostream belongs to David Katz, Obama&#039;s personal photographer...

Chances are the Big O had little to do with it aside from signing a release...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that photostream belongs to David Katz, Obama&#8217;s personal photographer&#8230;</p>
<p>Chances are the Big O had little to do with it aside from signing a release&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mandy</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/president-obamas-flickr-account/comment-page-1/#comment-7108</link>
		<dc:creator>Mandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslrblog.com/president-obamas-flickr-account/#comment-7108</guid>
		<description>Wow that&#039;s a lot of photographs!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow that&#8217;s a lot of photographs!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Panic</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/president-obamas-flickr-account/comment-page-1/#comment-7106</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Panic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 22:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslrblog.com/president-obamas-flickr-account/#comment-7106</guid>
		<description>Being nearly 2009, it would be utterly stupid for anyone remotely in the public light to not have a well established social networking presence.  I know of too many bands, DJs, graphic designers, photographers, etc. etc. who don&#039;t even have real websites anymore, they rely solely on MySpace or FaceBook or both of them.  The only exception is that their domain-name.com might redirect to their myfacesitebookflickr page.  

We live in a world now not only of instant information but of instant user generated, critiqued, commented and suggested feedback as well.  We all expect to be able to &lt;i&gt;touch&lt;/i&gt; the people we see on TV or in movies, same goes for political figures.  Even if Obama&#039;s PR team manages his Flickr account (and I&#039;m sure they do), it, if nothing else, gives the appearance that he is a mortal man and not anyone out of the ordinary.  

Thousands of prints, slides and negs of the Kennedy family were lost when the twin towers were attacked, they were stored in a safe in the basement of one of the two buildings.  Most were never publicly shown, now we&#039;ll never see them, at least now we have a chance of seeing more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being nearly 2009, it would be utterly stupid for anyone remotely in the public light to not have a well established social networking presence.  I know of too many bands, DJs, graphic designers, photographers, etc. etc. who don&#8217;t even have real websites anymore, they rely solely on MySpace or FaceBook or both of them.  The only exception is that their domain-name.com might redirect to their myfacesitebookflickr page.  </p>
<p>We live in a world now not only of instant information but of instant user generated, critiqued, commented and suggested feedback as well.  We all expect to be able to <i>touch</i> the people we see on TV or in movies, same goes for political figures.  Even if Obama&#8217;s PR team manages his Flickr account (and I&#8217;m sure they do), it, if nothing else, gives the appearance that he is a mortal man and not anyone out of the ordinary.  </p>
<p>Thousands of prints, slides and negs of the Kennedy family were lost when the twin towers were attacked, they were stored in a safe in the basement of one of the two buildings.  Most were never publicly shown, now we&#8217;ll never see them, at least now we have a chance of seeing more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Leclerc</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/president-obamas-flickr-account/comment-page-1/#comment-7103</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Leclerc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 04:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslrblog.com/president-obamas-flickr-account/#comment-7103</guid>
		<description>the flickr is kinda cool. I&#039;m not sure how interesting it will be...but it&#039;s nice to see they are trying to push the interaction with the public in new ways. Even if they don&#039;t pull it off all that well, at least they&#039;re trying new things. Far too many people in that sort of position try pretty hard not to try anything new for fear of the unknown consequences or failure or some other silly reason....so at the very least he and/or his team, have that going for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the flickr is kinda cool. I&#8217;m not sure how interesting it will be&#8230;but it&#8217;s nice to see they are trying to push the interaction with the public in new ways. Even if they don&#8217;t pull it off all that well, at least they&#8217;re trying new things. Far too many people in that sort of position try pretty hard not to try anything new for fear of the unknown consequences or failure or some other silly reason&#8230;.so at the very least he and/or his team, have that going for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urkel</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/president-obamas-flickr-account/comment-page-1/#comment-7102</link>
		<dc:creator>Urkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 15:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslrblog.com/president-obamas-flickr-account/#comment-7102</guid>
		<description>Did you ever think you would see the day when the president of the United States had his own logo? How about his own taglines? His own website where he sells t-shirts? His own Twitter account?

Obama having his own flickr is interesting but it is far from being the window into his personal life the way it is for many others. I&#039;m not saying it&#039;s bad, but it is a bit twisted to see our future president being marketed like a new gadget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever think you would see the day when the president of the United States had his own logo? How about his own taglines? His own website where he sells t-shirts? His own Twitter account?</p>
<p>Obama having his own flickr is interesting but it is far from being the window into his personal life the way it is for many others. I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s bad, but it is a bit twisted to see our future president being marketed like a new gadget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

