<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photographer Ethics &#8211; Diana Photograph Controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dslrblog.com/photographer-ethics-diana-photograph-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dslrblog.com/photographer-ethics-diana-photograph-controversy/</link>
	<description>the stories behind the images</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/photographer-ethics-diana-photograph-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-5913</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5913</guid>
		<description>Personally I think it is OK to publish this Picture. It is actually an event that occured as tragic as it may have been. 

In my opinion a Picture that just shows History (and is not edited to show some untrue things) is OK to publish unless not a specific person or group is being hurt/damaged in any way by doing so. I am speaking of real damage here as in financially or reputational ways or similar.
Overall I think that as a Photographer (regardless of profession) we are supposed to record the history of the world and should be allowed to show it in an unaltered way. Exceptions as stated earlier may apply under very special circumstances... in this case I see none (I might be wrong, so speak up if I am)

For what I would understand least is why it should be treated differently just because it was about Princess Diana. There have been many other more cruel and more ethical suspect things been posted in the past with less fuss about it ...

Who might like such tragic Photos may be another story ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I think it is OK to publish this Picture. It is actually an event that occured as tragic as it may have been. </p>
<p>In my opinion a Picture that just shows History (and is not edited to show some untrue things) is OK to publish unless not a specific person or group is being hurt/damaged in any way by doing so. I am speaking of real damage here as in financially or reputational ways or similar.<br />
Overall I think that as a Photographer (regardless of profession) we are supposed to record the history of the world and should be allowed to show it in an unaltered way. Exceptions as stated earlier may apply under very special circumstances&#8230; in this case I see none (I might be wrong, so speak up if I am)</p>
<p>For what I would understand least is why it should be treated differently just because it was about Princess Diana. There have been many other more cruel and more ethical suspect things been posted in the past with less fuss about it &#8230;</p>
<p>Who might like such tragic Photos may be another story &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/photographer-ethics-diana-photograph-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-5914</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5914</guid>
		<description>Who might like them is a good point - there wouldn&#039;t be a market for this picture if the public hadn&#039;t shown an appetite for newspapers featuring them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who might like them is a good point &#8211; there wouldn&#8217;t be a market for this picture if the public hadn&#8217;t shown an appetite for newspapers featuring them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/photographer-ethics-diana-photograph-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-5915</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5915</guid>
		<description>I do agree with you ...
Bad Sensation was, is and probably always will draw higher attention to it than anything else ... unfortunately !
Well, how else would we explain that Shows like &quot;Big Brother&quot; and the likes (showing others Life at display to the wide public) are such a big success ? It is just a fact that people are more interested in the lifes of others than sometimes their own.

Ironic if you come to think about it: The Accident was caused by Papparazzi chasing Diana in Hunt for some Bad Sensation !
Even more ironic that the event (accident) that was caused by Paparazzi is now resulting in another &quot;Big Wave&quot; concerning about Pictures and Publication ! Not to say bad sensation !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do agree with you &#8230;<br />
Bad Sensation was, is and probably always will draw higher attention to it than anything else &#8230; unfortunately !<br />
Well, how else would we explain that Shows like &#8220;Big Brother&#8221; and the likes (showing others Life at display to the wide public) are such a big success ? It is just a fact that people are more interested in the lifes of others than sometimes their own.</p>
<p>Ironic if you come to think about it: The Accident was caused by Papparazzi chasing Diana in Hunt for some Bad Sensation !<br />
Even more ironic that the event (accident) that was caused by Paparazzi is now resulting in another &#8220;Big Wave&#8221; concerning about Pictures and Publication ! Not to say bad sensation !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carpeicthus</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/photographer-ethics-diana-photograph-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-5916</link>
		<dc:creator>carpeicthus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5916</guid>
		<description>The ethical question changes if the photographer was one of the guys who were chasing her through the city at high speeds. Bit different than passively recording a scene.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ethical question changes if the photographer was one of the guys who were chasing her through the city at high speeds. Bit different than passively recording a scene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/photographer-ethics-diana-photograph-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-5917</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5917</guid>
		<description>I get your point, I would add it would be worse if the guy was in the way of medical services or standing well back allowing her to be tended to</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get your point, I would add it would be worse if the guy was in the way of medical services or standing well back allowing her to be tended to</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/photographer-ethics-diana-photograph-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-5918</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5918</guid>
		<description>I really want to see this photo/s.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really want to see this photo/s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/photographer-ethics-diana-photograph-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-6313</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6313</guid>
		<description>Personally I did not like Princess Diana. Even though i was fully aware she was a well liked member of the royal family, but should not be treated any different than Joe Blogg&#039;s. Her death may have been tragic for some and quite controversial but the photograph  should not even have thought of as being reserved or held back. In my opinion it was a matter of public interest and as such it had to be published. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I did not like Princess Diana. Even though i was fully aware she was a well liked member of the royal family, but should not be treated any different than Joe Blogg&#8217;s. Her death may have been tragic for some and quite controversial but the photograph  should not even have thought of as being reserved or held back. In my opinion it was a matter of public interest and as such it had to be published.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

