<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking for a wide lense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dslrblog.com/looking-for-a-wide-lense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dslrblog.com/looking-for-a-wide-lense/</link>
	<description>the stories behind the images</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/looking-for-a-wide-lense/comment-page-1/#comment-6062</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6062</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the late reply.  Yes, I do have the Tokina 12-24.  I don&#039;t believe 17mm is wide enough so the 17-40 as an ultrawide zoom isn&#039;t going to do the job right.  I would stick with a 10-20 or a 12-24.  

I chose the Tokina based on excellent reviews and of course the sample images I&#039;ve seen on the web.  Bonus points for excellent build quality, decent price, and the Tokina is the only ultrawide zoom with a constant f/4 aperture.  All the other lenses are variable aperture.  I would have liked the Canon 10-20 myself but the price was a bit steep for what you get, and although I like the Sigma, I was a bit worried about the gamble you take with the (lack of) quality control in their lenses. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the late reply.  Yes, I do have the Tokina 12-24.  I don&#8217;t believe 17mm is wide enough so the 17-40 as an ultrawide zoom isn&#8217;t going to do the job right.  I would stick with a 10-20 or a 12-24.  </p>
<p>I chose the Tokina based on excellent reviews and of course the sample images I&#8217;ve seen on the web.  Bonus points for excellent build quality, decent price, and the Tokina is the only ultrawide zoom with a constant f/4 aperture.  All the other lenses are variable aperture.  I would have liked the Canon 10-20 myself but the price was a bit steep for what you get, and although I like the Sigma, I was a bit worried about the gamble you take with the (lack of) quality control in their lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/looking-for-a-wide-lense/comment-page-1/#comment-6063</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6063</guid>
		<description>Looks like the Tokina is well worth investigating then, thanks Bernard! It is also intended for APS-C sensors but about £200 cheaper ... MMmmmmmmmm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the Tokina is well worth investigating then, thanks Bernard! It is also intended for APS-C sensors but about £200 cheaper &#8230; MMmmmmmmmm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/looking-for-a-wide-lense/comment-page-1/#comment-6075</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6075</guid>
		<description>May I suggest the Tokina 12-24mm?  You won&#039;t be disappointed.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I suggest the Tokina 12-24mm?  You won&#8217;t be disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/looking-for-a-wide-lense/comment-page-1/#comment-6076</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6076</guid>
		<description>I never considered Tokina, do you have the lense yourself? My problem is there arent any camera shops around here where I can try lenses out so have to rely on web reviews :O(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never considered Tokina, do you have the lense yourself? My problem is there arent any camera shops around here where I can try lenses out so have to rely on web reviews :O(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/looking-for-a-wide-lense/comment-page-1/#comment-6077</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6077</guid>
		<description>I use a 17-40mm which is stunning (but expensive),

I have a mate who has teh 10-22mm who raves about it. He uses it for semi-pro shoots and gets some great results. Havn&#039;t played with it myself but it looks like a more affordable option and is super wide....

Perhaps one of the prime lenses? The 20mm f2.8 seems to get good reviews...

interested to see what you end up with</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a 17-40mm which is stunning (but expensive),</p>
<p>I have a mate who has teh 10-22mm who raves about it. He uses it for semi-pro shoots and gets some great results. Havn&#8217;t played with it myself but it looks like a more affordable option and is super wide&#8230;.</p>
<p>Perhaps one of the prime lenses? The 20mm f2.8 seems to get good reviews&#8230;</p>
<p>interested to see what you end up with</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/looking-for-a-wide-lense/comment-page-1/#comment-6078</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6078</guid>
		<description>Thanks Darren, it&#039;s good to know the 17-40 and 10-22mm are good lenses. I am majorly conflicted over this purchase, especially as I told my wife the last lense purchase would do me for quite a while (I don&#039;t think she really believed me but I said it so can be used as evidence).

Do you use the 17-40mm much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Darren, it&#8217;s good to know the 17-40 and 10-22mm are good lenses. I am majorly conflicted over this purchase, especially as I told my wife the last lense purchase would do me for quite a while (I don&#8217;t think she really believed me but I said it so can be used as evidence).</p>
<p>Do you use the 17-40mm much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohn</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/looking-for-a-wide-lense/comment-page-1/#comment-6079</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6079</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been struggling with this very decision myself. I rented the 10-22 and had some great fun and success with - fantastic for pet photos it turns out. The 17-40 would make a more complete walk around lens though, and currently with a rebate in the states. I&#039;m just not sure which to settle on.

I&#039;m also getting big into panoramas, 20mm being prefered,so again either would do it. 

One offers greater creativity, the other being more multi-purposed. I almost wish one was a leader quality/performance-wise to make the decision easier ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been struggling with this very decision myself. I rented the 10-22 and had some great fun and success with &#8211; fantastic for pet photos it turns out. The 17-40 would make a more complete walk around lens though, and currently with a rebate in the states. I&#8217;m just not sure which to settle on.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also getting big into panoramas, 20mm being prefered,so again either would do it. </p>
<p>One offers greater creativity, the other being more multi-purposed. I almost wish one was a leader quality/performance-wise to make the decision easier <img src='http://dslrblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/looking-for-a-wide-lense/comment-page-1/#comment-6080</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6080</guid>
		<description>Tricky isn&#039;t it? I am starting to lean towards a prime for the widest focal length and a general purpose crisp, sharp and fast zoom. And a flash. and ... ;O)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tricky isn&#8217;t it? I am starting to lean towards a prime for the widest focal length and a general purpose crisp, sharp and fast zoom. And a flash. and &#8230; ;O)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohn</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/looking-for-a-wide-lense/comment-page-1/#comment-6081</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6081</guid>
		<description>Amazingly tricky, yes!

Pity we&#039;re not all rich. I gave it a lot of serious consideration last night (your blog entry is the catalyst I needed to make a decision it seems). I&#039;ve pretty much settled on getting the 17-40L now, taking advantage of the rebate. I&#039;ll save for a bit and in a few months -fall?- I&#039;ll get the Sigma 10-20 to satisfy my very wide desires (I&#039;m still trying to work out though if this is a good lens like recent print reviews indicate, or if it has problems like are mentioned on fredmiranda.com&#039;s user reviews). I believe I&#039;d have an amazing amount of fun right out of the shoot with the wider lens, but the 17-40L will be a much more practical lens for the wild running around of the summer months (festivals, backyard BBQ&#039;s, and the like).

Of course I might change my mind again! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazingly tricky, yes!</p>
<p>Pity we&#8217;re not all rich. I gave it a lot of serious consideration last night (your blog entry is the catalyst I needed to make a decision it seems). I&#8217;ve pretty much settled on getting the 17-40L now, taking advantage of the rebate. I&#8217;ll save for a bit and in a few months -fall?- I&#8217;ll get the Sigma 10-20 to satisfy my very wide desires (I&#8217;m still trying to work out though if this is a good lens like recent print reviews indicate, or if it has problems like are mentioned on fredmiranda.com&#8217;s user reviews). I believe I&#8217;d have an amazing amount of fun right out of the shoot with the wider lens, but the 17-40L will be a much more practical lens for the wild running around of the summer months (festivals, backyard BBQ&#8217;s, and the like).</p>
<p>Of course I might change my mind again! <img src='http://dslrblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/looking-for-a-wide-lense/comment-page-1/#comment-6082</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6082</guid>
		<description>Yeah a good lottery win would make this so much easier ;O) I have pretty much decided after looking at about a thousand pics the 10 is too wide for my purposes. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah a good lottery win would make this so much easier ;O) I have pretty much decided after looking at about a thousand pics the 10 is too wide for my purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

