<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DPReview Joins the Blogosphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dslrblog.com/dpreview-joins-the-blogosphere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dslrblog.com/dpreview-joins-the-blogosphere/</link>
	<description>the stories behind the images</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 11:37:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Davey</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/dpreview-joins-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-7100</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Davey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 11:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslrblog.com/?p=927#comment-7100</guid>
		<description>The problem with DPReview is the flamewars.  Its forum has little value because it is largely peopled by sneering Nikon/Canon loyalists.  

I like Michael Reichmann&#039;s reviews on Luminous Landscape. He refuses to accept freebies or discounts from anyone and his reviews are very hands-on and backed up by a DEEP well of knowledge of how things work.  He also moderates his forums to some extent and closes off any flaming tit-for-tats.

http://luminous-landscape.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with DPReview is the flamewars.  Its forum has little value because it is largely peopled by sneering Nikon/Canon loyalists.  </p>
<p>I like Michael Reichmann&#8217;s reviews on Luminous Landscape. He refuses to accept freebies or discounts from anyone and his reviews are very hands-on and backed up by a DEEP well of knowledge of how things work.  He also moderates his forums to some extent and closes off any flaming tit-for-tats.</p>
<p><a href="http://luminous-landscape.com/" rel="nofollow">http://luminous-landscape.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Leclerc</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/dpreview-joins-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-7098</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Leclerc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 04:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslrblog.com/?p=927#comment-7098</guid>
		<description>They definitely need a bit more balance in the reviews...beyond the straight specs anyway. Hopefully the new blogs will open up an avenue to allow for some of that balance, even if it&#039;s coming from commenters. Hard to say though. Could easily crash and burn. Will be interesting to watch for a while either way I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They definitely need a bit more balance in the reviews&#8230;beyond the straight specs anyway. Hopefully the new blogs will open up an avenue to allow for some of that balance, even if it&#8217;s coming from commenters. Hard to say though. Could easily crash and burn. Will be interesting to watch for a while either way I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Panic</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/dpreview-joins-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-7097</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Panic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 00:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslrblog.com/?p=927#comment-7097</guid>
		<description>DPReview to me was never anything more than the facts, and a giant advertisement for every major camera and photography product on the market.  Never did they post anything mildly negative on any product, ever.  It&#039;s of no real value unless you are either looking for tech specs on a camera or want to deal with their archaic forums which are full of fanboys and girls and are terrible to navigate through.

Sorry if it really sounds negative, but I work in the photo industry and there are shortcomings with all camera gear, I wish major outlets like DPR would step up to the plate and say, &quot;this shiny new $8k dslr is great, but... &quot; because that&#039;s what most people want to know.  They want to know what&#039;s good and what&#039;s not good, DPR never offered that.

Personally, I think they are two years too late on the blog thing and it was / is probably a way for Amazon, who know owns DPR to use it as a way of directly connecting with the readers and push more ad space / products, resulting in more sales.  Just a hunch though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DPReview to me was never anything more than the facts, and a giant advertisement for every major camera and photography product on the market.  Never did they post anything mildly negative on any product, ever.  It&#8217;s of no real value unless you are either looking for tech specs on a camera or want to deal with their archaic forums which are full of fanboys and girls and are terrible to navigate through.</p>
<p>Sorry if it really sounds negative, but I work in the photo industry and there are shortcomings with all camera gear, I wish major outlets like DPR would step up to the plate and say, &#8220;this shiny new $8k dslr is great, but&#8230; &#8221; because that&#8217;s what most people want to know.  They want to know what&#8217;s good and what&#8217;s not good, DPR never offered that.</p>
<p>Personally, I think they are two years too late on the blog thing and it was / is probably a way for Amazon, who know owns DPR to use it as a way of directly connecting with the readers and push more ad space / products, resulting in more sales.  Just a hunch though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

