Category Archives: Photographers in the News

Creative commons: How safe is your work?

Do you use a creative commons license on your Flickr photos. Do you even know what it is? Well very basically it is a license that you grant that allows non-profit use and sharing of your photography (More Info).

Why am I talking about it now?, well the legal strength of the idea has just been put to test in court. Adam Curry the ‘POD father’ has recently taken to court a Dutch magazine for publishing pictures from his Flickr account. The magazine apparently thought that since the photos were on the internet they could do whatever they liked.

So did Adam win his case? Well let’s just say he didn’t lose. The creative commons was upheld but the magazine got away with a fine. There was no real deterrant to stop this happening again. And you and me won’t have the resources to fight back like Adam did.

Thanks for standing up for us dude :)

Photographing the Winter Olympics

This is an interesting article about photojournalist Vincent Laforet and his experience of photographing the Torino Winter Olympics.

Apple – Pro/Photo – Vincent Laforet, pg.1

There are no medals awarded for photojournalism at the Winter Olympics. But anyone watching photojournalist Vincent Laforet run with 50 pounds of equipment from the Oval Lingotto — where he’d just photographed 5000-meter speedskater Chad Hedrick winning America’s first gold medal of the 2006 Games — toward Palavela, the pairs figure skating venue, a chilly mile away, might easily believe that he was witnessing an unannounced leg of a new Olympic test sport.

Even though it is obviously there to promote Apple products I still enjoy an insight into a professional photographers working experiences.

“What gives you an advantage as a photojournalist are your wits, your eye, the amount of research you do, and the speed with which you can deliver images.”

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Making versus Taking Photographs

What is the difference between making a photograph and taking one? It seems some photographers do not like the idea that an artist might stage a scene before capturing it, like the genre should be about recording what is there rather than “creating”.

NPR : Gregory Crewdson’s Photo Alchemy

Gregory Crewdson doesn’t so much take pictures as make them. Some critics say the photographer and artist is reinventing the genre by using film techniques to stage pictures.

I think the idea is fascinating and so obvious I can’t believe it is a new idea. Why is it ok for a cinematographer to do this and not a photographer? Where is the law that “photographs shouldnt lie”?

I have to agree with this post from Painted Raven

Some of the earliest photographs were staged, and the idea of ‘staging’ a picture has always been around, and part of photography to some degree… As for photos leaving unanswered questions? Do we ever know the full story behind a photo? While the photos are interesting, and it’s nice to see the arts in the public eye…

.

Again with the Digital Vs. Film!

OK, you might think this is getting boring but I found this article from a professional medium format user very interesting.

Source: Shootout

State-of-the-Art 35mm if like me you’re excited about the dramatic changes that are taking place in photography right now and want to know what’s happening at the bleeding edge, then you will likely find this of interest.


I chose Fuji Velvia as the film to use on the Pentax because it is the highest resolution colour film available. Not the finest grained — that honour goes to Fuji Provia 100F. But there is no colour film that can touch Velvia for resolution. The Canon was set to ISO 100, even though Velvia is rated at ISO 40. I could have set the Canon to ISO 50, but this is a reduced dynamic range setting, and in any event I was looking to primarily compare resolution, not grain. Digital has finer grain by far than film.

I am only left with the conclusion that I no longer retain any advantage in shooting medium format film. It’s more expensive, less convenient and produces lower quality images. The range of lenses available to me is much greater with 35mm digital, including the availability of longer lenses, wider lenses, more zooms, Image Stabilization, wider aperture primes, and tilt / shift lenses. You can see where I’m going, can’t you? At least this is the case using the tools and techniques that I have learned over the past 7 years of working digitally and the past 35 years of traditional darkroom work. Would this conclusion be any different if I used a different scanner, different film, and different medium format set-up? I can’t say for sure. I don’t think so though. Do you believe otherwise? Then please go out and do a similar test for yourself

So one photographers opinion? While he had other photographers help him in his tests this comment stands out for me (my emphasis)

For the past year I have been shooting for various magazines, – Vogue… Harper’s Bazaar…Vibe – with the Canon 1D and recently with the 1Ds. I was told by the math-bound technocrats that I could not print a double page spread with the 1D. – a Vogue spread is 11×17 – only to prove them wrong by printing a Kodak Approval print for the 1D file against the 6×7 film 200mg file drum scanned on a Crossfield. When I asked the printer to pick the Kodak Approval he thought was best; he picked the 1D Kodak Approval. No contest!

…. It is my experience that the 1Ds images appear to be almost grainless and sharper than 6×7 film. Compare prints — any size — from each format and the 1Ds print is chosen every time. — Melvin Sokolsky

I guess these are only opinions but I think if people, professionals, are making these calls now (2003 actually), how much life in general use has film got? Not much by my reckoning. Let the luddites and sentimentalists stick to the old school, my money is on digital!

Shoot the Prince

Lexar has collected a group of professional photographers to blog about their photographs and photography work. Well worth putting on your regular reading list.

Particularly interesting, to me at least, are the enjoyable details of their adventures and assignments, also the tips they share and the equipment choices they make.

I am not a royalist (far from it) but I found the Shoot the Prince post from Michael Fox fascinating (Subject was Prince Charles, equipment used 24-70mm lens, Canon EOS 1D Mark II N, KATA waterproof camera cover). Contrast this with Didrik Johnck’s Weblog who spent time up the mountains of Tibet (Canon 20D).

Great stuff, go check them out!

Top photographer blogs

I just followed a link to find Dan Chung the Guardian photographer has a blog. I love finding new photography blogs, it is great to view new well taken photographs and also to read some of the thoughts and techniques behind them.

Dan just upgraded to a Eos 5D so I look forward to reading his assessment of the camera. It’s a more powerful sibling of my own beloved 350d.
Technorati Tags: , , ,