<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DSLRBLOG - Photography Business Blog &#187; Online Photography Community</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dslrblog.com/categories/news-and-commentary/online-photography-community/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dslrblog.com</link>
	<description>Starting and Running a Successful Photography Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:38:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Photography WordPress Themes</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/photography-wordpress-themes/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/photography-wordpress-themes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DSLRBlog Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslrblog.com/?p=1689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you know I&#8217;ve been slowly (very slowly, sometimes) working on a series of reviews of website templates for photographers. This has given me a bit of insight into the advantages and disadvantages of various kinds of solutions.
Along with the team over at Photocrati, as well as a couple teams of web designers, I contributed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you know I&#8217;ve been slowly (very slowly, sometimes) working on a series of reviews of website templates for photographers. This has given me a bit of insight into the advantages and disadvantages of various kinds of solutions.</p>
<p>Along with the team over at Photocrati, as well as a couple teams of web designers, I contributed that insight to help design a new series of <a href="http://www.photocrati.com">WordPress themes for photographers</a>. I think these are now one of the best low-cost solutions on the market (I&#8217;m biased, of course). I&#8217;m not going to write a full review of the themes, since it&#8217;s hard to objectively review a product you&#8217;ve helped design. But I do want to talk about what some of the advantages are, and, yes, some of the disadvantages. I&#8217;m going to structure this like my other reviews.</p>
<p>Let me start by saying that we&#8217;ve converted this site and I&#8217;ve converted my own <a href="http://www.erickdanzer.com" target="_blank">phojournalism</a> site to the new Photocrati WordPress themes. Check them out here:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><a title="Photocrati Blog Themes" href="http://www.photocrati.com/" target="_blank">MORE INFORMATION</a> </strong>| <strong><a title="Photocrati Blog Themes" href="http://demos.photocrati.com" target="_blank">DEMO</a></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Photocrati Blog Themes" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.photocrati.com/photography-wordpress-themes" target="_blank"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1744" title="photocrati-emulsion-theme" src="http://dslrblog.com/wp-content/uploads/photocrati-emulsion-theme.png" alt="photocrati-emulsion-theme" width="482" height="370" /></a></p>
<p><strong>OVERALL APPEARANCE</strong></p>
<p>In my view, these templates are beautiful. They have just the look I like, which is a simple, elegant look that emphasizes the images. The rest of the site just kind of fades into the background. They use primarily whites, grays, and blacks for the background, which for me is less distracting from the images than greens/reds/oranges or other bright colors.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start with a few screenshots of the themes. Here they are:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.photocrati.com/photography-wordpress-themes"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1690" title="emulsion" src="http://dslrblog.com/wp-content/uploads/emulsion-300x254.jpg" alt="emulsion" width="270" height="229" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.photocrati.com/photography-wordpress-themes"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1691" title="lightbox" src="http://dslrblog.com/wp-content/uploads/lightbox-300x264.jpg" alt="lightbox" width="300" height="264" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.photocrati.com/photography-wordpress-themes"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1692" title="viewfinder" src="http://dslrblog.com/wp-content/uploads/viewfinder-300x266.jpg" alt="viewfinder" width="300" height="266" /></a></p>
<p>They have the look of many flash sites, even though they are not flash. The home page is designed with one large image space that contains a flash-style slide show.  The gallery pages contain rows and columns of thumbnails, which I prefer to &#8220;filmstrip&#8221; style thumbnails that require you to scroll up/down or side/side to see all the thumbnails in a gallery. <span id="more-1689"></span></p>
<p>I actually like the gallery look enough that I actually use a gallery as my home page on my new photojournalism site. Below a screen shot of my new homepage. It also shows you want the galleries generally look like (although you can customize those like everything else.</p>
<p><strong>Grade: A</strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://dslrblog.com/wp-content/uploads/erick-danzer-photography.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1696" title="erick-danzer-photography" src="http://dslrblog.com/wp-content/uploads/erick-danzer-photography-300x214.jpg" alt="erick-danzer-photography" width="300" height="214" /></a><br />
<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>EASE OF USE</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve often noted that there is an almost direct trade off between Ease of Use and Flexibility. Designers of templates can make thing easier by limiting the number of options you have, or they can give you lots of options, which will complicate things.</p>
<p>WordPress has lots of options. You can do almost anything with it. One downside of that is that WordPress themes are very much do it yourself solutions. You need to set up your own domain, your own hosting, and install WordPress. If you are familiar with all that, it&#8217;s really not too complicated. You can do it all in a few minutes at sites like &lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.BlueHost.Com/track/erickdan&#8221; target=&#8221;_blank&#8221;&gt;Bluehost&lt;/a&gt; that offer one-click installation of WordPress.</p>
<p>Once you&#8217;ve got your blog and you&#8217;ve got to fill it out, and make many of the layout decisions yourself. Again, this is great for flexibility, but less so if you are looking for a plug-and-play-and-don&#8217;t-worry-about-it kind of site.</p>
<p>That said, pound for pound, WordPress is known to be one of the easiest web platforms to learn, giving you a tremendous amount of flexibility for a relatively short learning curve. And once you know WordPress, it IS easy.</p>
<p><strong>Grade: B</strong></p>
<p><strong>FLEXIBILITY OF DESIGN</strong></p>
<p>If these themes have a learning curve for WordPress newcomers, then the payoff is incredible flexibility. There really is very little you CAN&#8217;T do with a WordPress site. You can change colors, fonts, layout. Add elements or take them away. Move elements around. Add text where you want it. Integrate with social media. You can even add a full-fledged forum or e-commerce shopping center to your site if you want to.</p>
<p>The WordPress community is huge, and there are thousands of plug-ins that allow you to do just about anything.</p>
<p><strong>Grade: A</strong></p>
<p><strong>BLOGGING CAPABILITY</strong></p>
<p>WordPress is the world&#8217;s most powerful blogging platform. Not much more to say.</p>
<p><strong>Grade: A</strong></p>
<p><strong>E-COMMERCE FUNCTIONALITY</strong></p>
<p>I mentioned just a paragraph or two that there are all kinds of E-Commerce plugin-ins that allow you to add full shopping capability to WordPress. So the potential is there.</p>
<p>But for the time being, these these don&#8217;t offer what many of us want, which is the ability to sell photos directly from our galleries. The Photocrati team is working on this, but doing it in a way that is simple and elegant is tough work.</p>
<p>So for the time being, unless you are a WordPress guru who can do it yourself with one of the E-Commerce plugins, then you are out of luck until the Photocrati team comes up with an easy method to do it.</p>
<p><strong>Grade: D</strong></p>
<p><strong>COST AND FEE STRUCTURE</strong></p>
<p>Again, it doesn&#8217;t really get any better. Right now the Photocrati themes are selling for $59 each &#8211; for lifetime rights to the themes any updates. Pay once, low price, and it&#8217;s yours for life. Most highly managed template solutions (Photobiz/PhotoShelter/etc) entail ongoing monthly payments ranging from low to very high.</p>
<p><strong>Grade: A</strong></p>
<p>SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION</p>
<p>Once again, WordPress is widely known to have about the best SEO capability that it&#8217;s possible to have. It has an inherent advantage over managed flash solutions, because it is a powerful blogging engine. And search engines love blog-style content &#8211; it fits all the qualities that search algorithms look for and therefore does very well. That&#8217;s while small mom-and-pop blogs can compete on the front page of Google with major multinational corporations.</p>
<p><strong>Grade: A</strong><br />
<strong><br />
FREE TRIALS AND GUARANTEES</strong></p>
<p>Photocrati offers a 30-day money back guarantee that entails sending one email requesting a refund. Easy enough.</p>
<p><strong>Grade: A</strong></p>
<p><strong>CONCLUSION</strong></p>
<p>So, as you can see above, the Photocrati themes are strong in almost every aspect. They have two weaknesses: they do not yet offer the ability to sell your images directly from your site, and there is a learning curve for users who are new to WordPress. The second weakness, however, goes hand-in-hand with overwhelming flexibility. The reason there&#8217;s a learning curve is that, with WordPress, you are in control, and you can do just about anything.</p>
<p>As of now, pound for pound, I think these are best low-cost solution on the market, and it competes effectively with some highly managed solutions that cost 10-20 times more.</p>
<p><strong>OVERALL GRADE: A-</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/photography-wordpress-themes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DPReview Joins the Blogosphere</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/dpreview-joins-the-blogosphere/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/dpreview-joins-the-blogosphere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Leclerc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dpreview.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslrblog.com/?p=927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s right, one of the biggest names in digital photography is starting not one, but two brand-spanking-new blogs.
From DPReview.com&#8230;
Dragged kicking and screaming into 2008 we&#8217;ve finally decided to break the code of silence which hovered over the inner workings of the dpreview beast and launch our very own blog, or blogs to be more precise.
They&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right, one of the biggest names in digital photography is starting not one, but two brand-spanking-new blogs.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0811/08110602dpreviewblog.asp">DPReview.com</a>&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Dragged kicking and screaming into 2008 we&#8217;ve finally decided to break the code of silence which hovered over the inner workings of the dpreview beast and launch our very own blog, or blogs to be more precise.</p></blockquote>
<p>They&#8217;ve start two separate blogs: one for the <a href="http://blog.dpreview.com/editorial/">editorial</a> side of things, and one for the <a href="http://blog.dpreview.com/dev/">developer</a> side.</p>
<p>Looks like they will be using the blogs primary to open up the site to some transparency, which is always nice, as well as being a direct link to the community for questions, comments, and the expected flamewars that are sure to come.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see how active the blogs are beyond the usual reviews and such, and of course the ability to rant tends to bring out the best AND worst in people, so only time can tell how the community will react to the personalities behind the blogs. So far though, it&#8217;s looking pretty good.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested in camera/equipment reviews, and photography in general, I&#8217;d highly suggest checking them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/dpreview-joins-the-blogosphere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Viewfinder: See Pictures Matched with 3D Google Earth Scenes</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/viewfinder-see-pictures-matched-with-3d-google-earth-scenes/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/viewfinder-see-pictures-matched-with-3d-google-earth-scenes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viewfinder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viewing photos online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslrblog.com/viewfinder-see-pictures-matched-with-3d-google-earth-scenes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Viewfinder is a project from the University of Southern California that promises to allow you to see your pictures in context within a 3D Google Earth scene. It&#8217;s not ready to try out but the demos are very impressive.
Here is what they say about it:
“Viewfinder” is a novel method for users to spatially situate, or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="float: left; margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" src="http://www.boingboing.net/images/viewfinderrrr.jpg" alt="Viewfinderrrr" align="left" border="1" height="200" hspace="4" vspace="4" width="262" /><br />
<a href="http://interactive.usc.edu/viewfinder/">Viewfinder</a> is a project from the University of Southern California that promises to allow you to see your pictures in context within a 3D Google Earth scene. It&#8217;s not ready to try out but the demos are very impressive.</p>
<p>Here is what they say about it:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Viewfinder” is a novel method for users to spatially situate, or “find the pose,” of their photographs, and then to view these photographs, along with others, as perfectly aligned overlays in a 3D world model such as Google Earth</p></blockquote>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t really make much sense until you watch the video and then it becomes much more exciting!</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7VffQfDCYns&amp;amp;rel=0&amp;amp;hl=en"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7VffQfDCYns&amp;amp;rel=0&amp;amp;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/viewfinder-see-pictures-matched-with-3d-google-earth-scenes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flickr Launches Commons</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/flickr-launches-commons/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/flickr-launches-commons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finding photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslrblog.com/flickr-launches-commons/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
What can be achieved when you combine thousands of images, tags and photographers? Flickr thinks they have the answer with their Commons feature. Check out the info over at the Flickr Blog
What if we could lend this wonderful power to some of the huge reference collections around the world? What if you could contribute your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img id="image_12_img" class="myskitch-image-img" style="border: 0px none; width: 321px;" src="http://img.skitch.com/20080116-jjwutpsedy771prh13r6qi6qhr.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>What can be achieved when you combine thousands of images, tags and photographers? Flickr thinks they have the answer with their <a href="http://flickr.com/commons">Commons</a> feature. Check out the info over at the <a href="http://blog.flickr.com/2008/01/16/many-hands-make-light-work/">Flickr Blog</a></p>
<blockquote><p>What if we could lend this wonderful power to some of the huge reference collections around the world? What if you could contribute your own description of a certain photo in, say, the Library of Congress’ vast photographic archive, knowing that it might make the photo you’ve touched a little easier to find for the next person?Well… you can.</p>
<p>Announcing The Commons.</p></blockquote>
<p>Their first stab at this idea is the library of congress pilot project. While it is early days I think it could be quite an interesting scheme. There is by no means the wow factor of <a href="http://dslrblog.com/photosynth-wows-audience-at-ted/">Photosynth</a>, but imagine both working in combination &#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/flickr-launches-commons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photosynth Wows Audience at Ted</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/photosynth-wows-audience-at-ted/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/photosynth-wows-audience-at-ted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online photo community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photosynth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslrblog.com/photosynth-wows-audience-at-ted/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have talked about Microsofts super-cool photosynth acquisition before but never seen it demonstrated quite so well as this video from TED
Using photos of oft-snapped subjects (like Notre Dame) scraped from around the Web, Photosynth (based on Seadragon technology) creates breathtaking multidimensional spaces with zoom and navigation features that outstrip all expectation.
I am sure you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have talked about Microsofts super-cool photosynth acquisition before but never seen it demonstrated quite so well as this video from <a href="http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/129">TED</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Using photos of oft-snapped subjects (like Notre Dame) scraped from around the Web, Photosynth (based on Seadragon technology) creates breathtaking multidimensional spaces with zoom and navigation features that outstrip all expectation.</p></blockquote>
<p>I am sure you will agree, it&#8217;s the future! <img src='http://dslrblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><!--cut and paste--><object width="432" height="285" data="http://static.videoegg.com/ted/flash/loader.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="id" value="VE_Player" /><param name="align" value="middle" /><param name="FlashVars" value="bgColor=FFFFFF&amp;file=http://static.videoegg.com/ted/movies/BLAISEAGUERAYARCAS-2007_high.flv&amp;autoPlay=false&amp;fullscreenURL=http://static.videoegg.com/ted/flash/fullscreen.html&amp;forcePlay=false&amp;logo=&amp;allowFullscreen=true" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="scale" value="noscale" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="src" value="http://static.videoegg.com/ted/flash/loader.swf" /><param name="name" value="VE_Player" /><param name="flashvars" value="bgColor=FFFFFF&amp;file=http://static.videoegg.com/ted/movies/BLAISEAGUERAYARCAS-2007_high.flv&amp;autoPlay=false&amp;fullscreenURL=http://static.videoegg.com/ted/flash/fullscreen.html&amp;forcePlay=false&amp;logo=&amp;allowFullscreen=true" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/photosynth-wows-audience-at-ted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flickr Introduces Stats</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/flickr-introduces-stats/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/flickr-introduces-stats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography Websites and Online Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Promotion, Traffic, and SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flickr traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[views]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslrblog.com/flickr-introduces-stats/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
If you have ever wanted to know more info about your Flickr traffic, who looks at what, and where your views come from, the Flickr has the feature for you!
We’ve designed stats on Flickr to give you all sorts of insight into how people arrive at your photos.
The stats are updated daily and include referrers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2095/2109228692_31eaf4dc46_m.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>If you have ever wanted to know more info about your Flickr traffic, who looks at what, and where your views come from, the <a href="http://blog.flickr.com/2007/12/13/stats-stats-baby/">Flickr</a> has the feature for you!</p>
<blockquote><p>We’ve designed stats on Flickr to give you all sorts of insight into how people arrive at your photos.</p></blockquote>
<p>The stats are updated daily and include referrers from other sites and search engines, including search queries, individual photo views within the site, but nicely it does NOT include your own clicks which could skew results.</p>
<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2239/2108452829_8180626ac9_o.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>You need to be a pro user to get this feature, plus after activating you need to wait a while to actually see some statistics.</p>
<p>Visit Flickr now to <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/me/stats">activate your stats</a> or read more at the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/help/stats/">FAQ</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/flickr-introduces-stats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flickr Photo Editing Live</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/flickr-photo-editing-live/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/flickr-photo-editing-live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 12:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Editing and Digital Workflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo stream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picnik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslrblog.com/flickr-photo-editing-live/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flickr has now launched the joint-venture photo-editing feature with Picnik. This allows you to do basic tweaks to the pics in your photo stream. While not Photoshop, the ability is welcome, particularly when you have uploaded your pics on the move, for example from your phone camera.

When you first hit the edit button you are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flickr has now launched the joint-venture photo-editing feature with Picnik. This allows you to do basic tweaks to the pics in your photo stream. While not Photoshop, the ability is welcome, particularly when you have uploaded your pics on the move, for example from your phone camera.<br />
<img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2087/2088987334_19b36c840a_m.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>When you first hit the edit button you are asked to allow Picnik into your account.<br />
<img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2326/2088981246_c28cd470fb_m.jpg" alt="" /><br />
After that the editing interface <em>should</em> load. On my Mac&#8217;s Firefox it doesn&#8217;t, boo! Luckily I also have Safari.<br />
<img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2385/2088207835_ce08460ce6.jpg" alt="" /><br />
Strangely even in Safari I found I had to click through twice or more to actually get to edit. When it does work though it is a welcome addition!</p>
<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2271/2088216151_56a428c2d3_m.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>More info at the <a href="http://blog.flickr.com/2007/12/05/edit-your-photos-on-flickr/">Flickr Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/flickr-photo-editing-live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Disturbing Side of Flickr</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/the-disturbing-side-of-flickr/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/the-disturbing-side-of-flickr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problems with Flickr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslrblog.com/the-disturbing-side-of-flickr/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geekpreneur has a list of disturbing Flickr horror stories. What makes them most disturbing isn&#8217;t just the events but how powerless Flickr users are to stop them.
Most of the people on Flickr are a friendly sort. They’re helpful and chatty, and they usually have something nice to say about your pictures.  Most of them. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekpreneur.com/6-flickr-horror-stories">Geekpreneur</a> has a list of disturbing Flickr horror stories. What makes them most disturbing isn&#8217;t just the events but how powerless Flickr users are to stop them.</p>
<blockquote><p>Most of the people on Flickr are a friendly sort. They’re helpful and chatty, and they usually have something nice to say about your pictures.  Most of them.  Like anywhere though, you do get the odd creep sneaking in.</p></blockquote>
<p>Since one or two problems on Flickr I have become a lot more guarded about what I do and who I allow as contact.</p>
<ul>
<li>Any time I post a picture of children I try to make it friends and family only. Lately just family for certain pictures. There are just too many twisted people out there who have made it clear to me that these pictures are not safe for general consumption, no matter how proud we are of our kids. I can&#8217;t do anything about the copies that are on these &#8220;individuals&#8221; hard disks but can try to stop them getting any more new ones.</li>
<li>I am now very careful how I label and tag my pictures. I had to stop using the word &#8220;mum&#8221; because of these slimy people who seem to search for those words for their own perverted uses.</li>
<li>Now it seems pet and animal fans have to avoid drawing attention from people who think it is funny to submit images of abused or deceased animals.</li>
</ul>
<p>With people like these out there, could it be we are better off not joining communities like Flickr? I would say we should be aware of the problems, protect our privacy and try to enjoy these communities despite the sickos.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.geekpreneur.com/6-flickr-horror-stories">Read the post over here</a> and try not to have nightmares <img src='http://dslrblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/the-disturbing-side-of-flickr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which Famous Photographer Are You?</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/which-famous-photographer-are-you/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/which-famous-photographer-are-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslrblog.com/which-famous-photographer-are-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Which famous photographer are you?Ansel Adams:  Known for large scale silver gelatin landscapes especially of Yosemite National Park
&#8220;Sometimes I do get to places just when God&#8217;s ready to have somebody click the shutter.&#8221;



Click Here to Take This Quiz
Brought to you by YouThink.com quizzes and personality tests.



Via: D&#8217;Arcy
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="10" bgcolor="black">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="white">
<td align="center"><strong><span style="font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica; font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://www.youthink.com/quiz.asp?action=take&amp;quiz_id=164"><span style="color: #505a84;">Which famous photographer are you?</span></a></span></strong><span style="font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica; font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: #505a84; font-size: medium;"><strong>Ansel Adams:  Known for large scale silver gelatin landscapes especially of Yosemite National Park</strong></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica; font-size: x-small;">&#8220;Sometimes I do get to places just when God&#8217;s ready to have somebody click the shutter.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica; font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://www.youthink.com/quiz.asp?action=take&amp;quiz_id=164"><img src="http://www.youthink.com/quiz_images/quiz164outcome1.jpg" border="0" alt="Personality Test Results" /></a></span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center"><a href="http://www.youthink.com/quiz.asp?action=take&amp;quiz_id=164"><span style="font-family: verdana; color: white; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Click Here to Take This Quiz</strong></span></a><br />
<span style="font-family: verdana; color: #c0c0c0; font-size: xx-small;">Brought to you by <a href="http://www.youthink.com/quiz.asp"><span style="color: white;">YouThink.com</span></a> quizzes and personality tests.</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Via: <a href="http://www.darcynorman.net/2007/07/30/what-famous-photographer-are-you/">D&#8217;Arcy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/which-famous-photographer-are-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virgin Mobile Flickr Photo PR Disaster</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/virgin-mobile-flickr-photo-pr-disaster/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/virgin-mobile-flickr-photo-pr-disaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues, Ethics, Model Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Editing and Digital Workflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virgin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dslrblog.com/virgin-mobile-flickr-photo-pr-disaster/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read this fascinating story over at Gillianic Tendencies
What it seems to have happened is that Virgin Mobile, or an advertising agency they hired, decided to save lotsa moola and attempt some good PR (backfiring, obviously) by using Flickr photos with Creative Commons licenses (specifically, the ones that allowed commercial use) in a recent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read this fascinating story over at <a href="http://gunson.ca/blog/2007/07/19/virgin-mobile-australia-and-their-pr-mistake/">Gillianic Tendencies</a></p>
<blockquote><p>What it seems to have happened is that Virgin Mobile, or an advertising agency they hired, decided to save lotsa moola and attempt some good PR (backfiring, obviously) by using Flickr photos with Creative Commons licenses (specifically, the ones that allowed commercial use) in a recent ad campaign. Which, fine, is legal, though, perhaps, cheap-assed. What’s getting people especially crazy over this (and this doesn’t include me, thankfully) is that they’re using these photos without the models’ permissions</p></blockquote>
<p>It seems some random person has spotted Gillians Flickr photo of a smashed car used on an advertisement. No problem there, it was CC licensed in a way that meant only attribution was necessary. Notification to these Flickr users would have been the polite thing, but ok it&#8217;s not a <em>requirement</em>.</p>
<p>The crazy thing though is there are people in these advertisements. Without model releases. Being <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/sesh00/515961023/">insulted</a>.</p>
<p>There is <a href="http://awaketodream.net/?p=421">more coverage here</a> and <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/central/discuss/72157600541608353/">over at Flickr</a>.<br />
<em><br />
Tags: <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/flickr">flickr</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/virgin">virgin</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/copyright">copyright</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/cc">cc</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/license">license</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/pr">pr</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/disaster">disaster</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/virgin-mobile-flickr-photo-pr-disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo! Silences Rebekka In Photo Theft Outrage</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/yahoo-silences-rebekka-in-photo-theft-outrage/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/yahoo-silences-rebekka-in-photo-theft-outrage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 10:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas Hawk has news of a bizarre decision from Yahoo! over at <a href="http://thomashawk.com/2007/05/flickr-censorship.html">Flickr regarding the theft of Rebekkas work</a> <br /> <blockquote>So what's got me pissed today?  What's got me pissed today is that according to Rebekka, <a href="http://rebekkagudleifs.com/blog/2007/05/15/freedom-of-expression-telling-the-truth/">Flickr</a> has removed her image from their site. That's right. Not only did they remove and kill her image and her *non-violent* words of protest, but they censored each and every one of us who commented on her photograph, who offered support to Rebekka, who shared in her frustration by wiping every single one of our comments off the face of the internet forever.<br /><br />According to Rebekka, Flickr's explanation?<br /><span style="font-style: italic;"><br />“Flickr is not a venue for to you harass, abuse, impersonate, or intimidate others. If we receive a valid complaint about your conduct, we will send you a warning or<br />terminate your account.”</span><br /><br />WTF?!?<br /><br />So a flickr photographer gets ripped off. Dares to complain about it. Has an outpouring of support on the internet over it and Yahoo decides censorship is the way to handle this? This is the worst I've seen from Yahoo yet.</blockquote>Many of us worried when Yahoo! took over Flickr. It seems some of those worries might be well founded.<br /><br />Popular photographers like Thomas and Rebekka are people who built Flickr into the community it is (yes community, not just a picture hosting site). Even if they were not known at all, Yahoo! should be helping them not silencing them. To pour injustice on injustice is .... well, regardless of right and wrong, it's bad for business.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas Hawk has news of a bizarre decision from Yahoo! over at <a href="http://thomashawk.com/2007/05/flickr-censorship.html">Flickr regarding the theft of Rebekkas work</a></p>
<blockquote><p>So what&#8217;s got me pissed today?  What&#8217;s got me pissed today is that according to Rebekka, <a href="http://rebekkagudleifs.com/blog/2007/05/15/freedom-of-expression-telling-the-truth/">Flickr</a> has removed her image from their site. That&#8217;s right. Not only did they remove and kill her image and her *non-violent* words of protest, but they censored each and every one of us who commented on her photograph, who offered support to Rebekka, who shared in her frustration by wiping every single one of our comments off the face of the internet forever.</p>
<p>According to Rebekka, Flickr&#8217;s explanation?<br />
<span style="font-style: italic;"><br />
“Flickr is not a venue for to you harass, abuse, impersonate, or intimidate others. If we receive a valid complaint about your conduct, we will send you a warning or<br />
terminate your account.”</span></p>
<p>WTF?!?</p>
<p>So a flickr photographer gets ripped off. Dares to complain about it. Has an outpouring of support on the internet over it and Yahoo decides censorship is the way to handle this? This is the worst I&#8217;ve seen from Yahoo yet.</p></blockquote>
<p>Many of us worried when Yahoo! took over Flickr. It seems some of those worries might be well founded.</p>
<p>Popular photographers like Thomas and Rebekka are people who built Flickr into the community it is (yes community, not just a picture hosting site). Even if they were not known at all, Yahoo! should be helping them not silencing them. To pour injustice on injustice is &#8230;. well, regardless of right and wrong, it&#8217;s bad for business.<!--break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/yahoo-silences-rebekka-in-photo-theft-outrage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JPG Magazine Imploding?</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/jpg-magazine-imploding/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/jpg-magazine-imploding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 09:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8020 Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPG magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recall JPG magazine, the glossy magazine that took contributions from Flickr users? It seems there has been a corporate falling-out and Derek and Heather (the founders) are leaving ...<a href="http://powazek.com/posts/534">Derek tells his story</a> <br /> <blockquote>Unfortunately, issue 10 will be the last one that Heather and I will have a hand in. We are no longer working for JPG Magazine or 8020 Publishing.</blockquote>It's a great shame, the magazine had a lot going for it. Probably still does. But you have to think a magazine founded on community support is at the mercy of that community. A community that loves Derek and Heather ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recall JPG magazine, the glossy magazine that took contributions from Flickr users? It seems there has been a corporate falling-out and Derek and Heather (the founders) are leaving &#8230;<a href="http://powazek.com/posts/534">Derek tells his story</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Unfortunately, issue 10 will be the last one that Heather and I will have a hand in. We are no longer working for JPG Magazine or 8020 Publishing.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s a great shame, the magazine had a lot going for it. Probably still does. But you have to think a magazine founded on community support is at the mercy of that community. A community that loves Derek and Heather &#8230;<!--break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/jpg-magazine-imploding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DPReview bought by Amazon.com!</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/dpreview-bought-by-amazon-com/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/dpreview-bought-by-amazon-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 17:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPReview]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazon has only gone and bought <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0705/07051402amazonacquiresdpreview.asp">dpreview.com</a><br /> <blockquote>We're proud and excited to announce that Dpreview has been acquired by the worlds leading online retailer, Amazon.com.</blockquote>They must have really been cooking with those digital camera affiliate links!<br /><br />Seriously, congrats to Phil and the guys over there, fantastic news.<br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon has only gone and bought <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0705/07051402amazonacquiresdpreview.asp">dpreview.com</a></p>
<blockquote><p>We&#8217;re proud and excited to announce that Dpreview has been acquired by the worlds leading online retailer, Amazon.com.</p></blockquote>
<p>They must have really been cooking with those digital camera affiliate links!</p>
<p>Seriously, congrats to Phil and the guys over there, fantastic news.<br />
<!--break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/dpreview-bought-by-amazon-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nested Sets Coming To Flickr</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/nested-sets-coming-to-flickr/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/nested-sets-coming-to-flickr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 09:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nested sets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming photos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have long wanted to organise my Flickr sets into some sort of hierarchy. It seems Flickr have heard the transatlantic whining and set about giving us the ability to put sets in sets.<br /><br /><a href="http://thomashawk.com/2007/03/sets-of-sets-close-to-launch-on-flickr.html">Thomas Hawk</a> quotes Stewart Butterfield:<br /> <blockquote>"We're doing the final testing and design tweaks now :)" and "You'll be able to go five levels deep (beyond that seemed a little silly, but we'll see how people end up using it)." .</blockquote>I'm sure this will be a much used (and abused) feature. It got me thinking though how cool it would be to have much more control of the layout.<br /><br />Right now your flickr page is organised pretty much chronologically as a stream. Wouldn't it be nice to have the ability to perhaps put up a welcome message? Highlight your best stuff as well as your recent stuff? Your top tags? When a visitor arrives at the moment there is nothing to orient them, unless your recent stuff is good they are unlikely to go much deeper.<br /><br />I realise the way most people find my flickr photos is through my blogs or through flickr groups, but I think more people would promote their Flickr URL if they mutated into something more useful.<br />
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have long wanted to organise my Flickr sets into some sort of hierarchy. It seems Flickr have heard the transatlantic whining and set about giving us the ability to put sets in sets.</p>
<p><a href="http://thomashawk.com/2007/03/sets-of-sets-close-to-launch-on-flickr.html">Thomas Hawk</a> quotes Stewart Butterfield:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We&#8217;re doing the final testing and design tweaks now <img src='http://dslrblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8221; and &#8220;You&#8217;ll be able to go five levels deep (beyond that seemed a little silly, but we&#8217;ll see how people end up using it).&#8221; .</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m sure this will be a much used (and abused) feature. It got me thinking though how cool it would be to have much more control of the layout.</p>
<p>Right now your flickr page is organised pretty much chronologically as a stream. Wouldn&#8217;t it be nice to have the ability to perhaps put up a welcome message? Highlight your best stuff as well as your recent stuff? Your top tags? When a visitor arrives at the moment there is nothing to orient them, unless your recent stuff is good they are unlikely to go much deeper.</p>
<p>I realise the way most people find my flickr photos is through my blogs or through flickr groups, but I think more people would promote their Flickr URL if they mutated into something more useful.<br />
<!--break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/nested-sets-coming-to-flickr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flickr Rethinks Contact Limit</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/flickr-rethinks-contact-limit/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/flickr-rethinks-contact-limit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 15:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;">
 <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/thomashawk/377848848/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/135/377848848_f2f931ed84_m.jpg" alt="" style="border: solid 2px #000000;" /></a>
 <br />
 <span style="font-size: 0.9em; margin-top: 0px;">
  <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/thomashawk/377848848/">Flickr Does the Right Thing</a>
  <br />
  Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/thomashawk/">Thomas Hawk</a>.
 </span>
</div>
<a href="http://thomashawk.com/2007/02/flickr-does-right-thing.html">Thomas Hawk</a> has reported that Flickr has rethought the cap on Flickr contacts. Now reciprocal contacts will not be counted towards the limit, allowing people to amass larger numbers of contacts.<br />
<br />
More info at Thomas' <a href="http://thomashawk.com/2007/02/flickr-does-right-thing.html">blog post</a>.
<br clear="all" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;">
 <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/thomashawk/377848848/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/135/377848848_f2f931ed84_m.jpg" alt="" style="border: solid 2px #000000;" /></a><br />
 <br />
 <span style="font-size: 0.9em; margin-top: 0px;"><br />
  <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/thomashawk/377848848/">Flickr Does the Right Thing</a><br />
  <br />
  Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/thomashawk/">Thomas Hawk</a>.<br />
 </span>
</div>
<p><a href="http://thomashawk.com/2007/02/flickr-does-right-thing.html">Thomas Hawk</a> has reported that Flickr has rethought the cap on Flickr contacts. Now reciprocal contacts will not be counted towards the limit, allowing people to amass larger numbers of contacts.</p>
<p>More info at Thomas&#8217; <a href="http://thomashawk.com/2007/02/flickr-does-right-thing.html">blog post</a>.<br />
<br clear="all" /><!--break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/flickr-rethinks-contact-limit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flickr Losing Lustr</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/flickr-losing-lustr/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/flickr-losing-lustr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service changes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flickr have decided to downgrade their service. First downgrade won't affect most of us, I don't know many people who will be too upset with this one:<br /><blockquote>the new maximum number of contacts is 3,000 contacts (good luck with that), and each photo on Flickr can have a maximum of 75 tags.<br /></blockquote>It's the second that has me upset:<blockquote><br />On March 15th, 2007 we'll be discontinuing the old email-based Flickr sign in system. From that point on, everyone will have to use a Yahoo! ID to sign in to Flickr.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flickr have decided to downgrade their service. First downgrade won&#8217;t affect most of us, I don&#8217;t know many people who will be too upset with this one:</p>
<blockquote><p>the new maximum number of contacts is 3,000 contacts (good luck with that), and each photo on Flickr can have a maximum of 75 tags.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s the second that has me upset:</p>
<blockquote><p>On March 15th, 2007 we&#8217;ll be discontinuing the old email-based Flickr sign in system. From that point on, everyone will have to use a Yahoo! ID to sign in to Flickr.</p></blockquote>
<p>I hate hate HATE Yahoo! logins. I don&#8217;t use Yahoo! services, any of them, despite my ISP being affiliated with them.  My hope is that Flickr have a change of heart, or at least don&#8217;t further break their up to now excellent service with further backward &#8220;improvements&#8221; otherwise when my paid membership is used up I will be one of the many leaving. Restricting contacts etc, that just confirms their madness, but inflicting the sucky Yahoo! user account (and all that entails) just &#8230; annoys, irritates, blows.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not the end of the world, certainly not the apocalypse you would think reading the forums, and believe me I feel for the Flickr dudes and dudettes who are taking the flak right now for this.</p>
<p><a href="http://thomashawk.com/2007/01/theres-some-mighty-pissed-off-flickr.html">Thomas Hawk</a> has done a great job rounding up the members reactions.</p>
<blockquote><p>Flickr needs to reverse the asinine decisions made today to force people to merge their accounts with Yahoo and to place new limits on your contacts and tags.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/flickr-losing-lustr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flickr ups space limits, Christmas Easter Egg</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/flickr-ups-space-limits-christmas-easter-egg/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/flickr-ups-space-limits-christmas-easter-egg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo streams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space limits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisgcom/321178032/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/141/321178032_2a741d1dcd_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="ho ho ho me" align=right hspace=10/></a>Flickr has dropped an early Christmas present, upping accounts space limits
<blockquote>
unlimited uploads — the two gigabyte monthly limit is no more (yep, pro users have no limits on how many photos they can upload)! At the same time, we've upped the limit for free account members as well, from 20MB per month up to 100MB (yep, five times more)!
</blockquote>
I'm sure this will come in very handy and is a welcome improvement. While most people I know on the basic accounts do not really reach their account limits very often it can be frustrating the one time they need more. This will make the chance of this happening even more rare.
<p>
Much more fun is the Christmas Easter Egg (if there is such a thing!), add a note to a photograph in your Flickr stream saying "ho ho ho hat" or "ho ho ho beard" for a festive treat.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Photo Sharing" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisgcom/321178032/"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/141/321178032_2a741d1dcd_m.jpg" alt="ho ho ho me" hspace="10" width="240" height="160" align="right" /></a>Flickr has dropped an early Christmas present, upping accounts space limits</p>
<blockquote><p>unlimited uploads — the two gigabyte monthly limit is no more (yep, pro users have no limits on how many photos they can upload)! At the same time, we&#8217;ve upped the limit for free account members as well, from 20MB per month up to 100MB (yep, five times more)!</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m sure this will come in very handy and is a welcome improvement. While most people I know on the basic accounts do not really reach their account limits very often it can be frustrating the one time they need more. This will make the chance of this happening even more rare.</p>
<p>Much more fun is the Christmas Easter Egg (if there is such a thing!), add a note to a photograph in your Flickr stream saying &#8220;ho ho ho hat&#8221; or &#8220;ho ho ho beard&#8221; for a festive treat.<br />
<!--break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/flickr-ups-space-limits-christmas-easter-egg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DSLRBlog Updates &#8211; In the post</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/dslrblog-updates-in-the-post/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/dslrblog-updates-in-the-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sb-28]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisgcom/259693741/"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/90/259693741_041daf8432_m.jpg" alt="" align="right" height="160" hspace="10" width="240" /></a>Every day for a couple of weeks has been like my birthday, I have gotten to look forward to the postie arriving every morning to see what he might bring me. This has mainly been because of my (admittedly excessive) eBay activities, but also this morning two special deliveries cheered me right up.<br /><br />My latest eBay arrival was actually one of my first purchases. Big tip, if you want something quick do not pay by cheque, move on to the next auction where paypal is accepted. I "won" this SB-28 flash on the 9th of September, it arrived on the 30th! I will be doing a review of these flashes along with the SB-26 and how they compare to my 580ex soon now I have got some use out of them.<br /><br />The surprise parcels this morning were my <a href="http://dslrblog.com/blog/chris-garrett/10-free-flickr-minicards">moo cards</a> and my first ever published photograph.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisgcom/259692047/"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/80/259692047_de0af69d38_m.jpg" alt="" align="right" height="216" hspace="10" width="240" /></a>First the moo cards. They are really <i>really</i> nice. I will definitely be buying a set even though I don't really have a pressing need for them like Mark.<br /><br />I'm not sure what the done thing is with these cards, do you just take a random selection of your recent pictures (as I did with the free 10) or choose only your best work (if not your own choice, in who's opinion? interestingness?) or is it better to actually <i>design </i>an image to use?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisgcom/259692183/"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/119/259692183_3f4189af92_m.jpg" alt="" align="left" height="240" hspace="10" width="219" /></a>The best parcel has to be the <a href="http://dslrblog.com/blog/chris-garrett/my-good-news-is-strobists-dilemma">British Airways in-flight magazine with my picture in it</a>! For the professionals who see your work in print all the time you will probably think this is really lame but it was quite a moment for me when I opened up this magazine and saw my name under my photograph.<br /><br /><center><br /><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisgcom/259692330/"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/119/259692330_ed83619417_m.jpg" alt="" height="160" width="240" /></a><br /></center><br /><br />Maybe next time someone might be willing to even pay me...<br /><br />Seeing as <a href="http://dslrblog.com/blog/chris-garrett/strobist-lighting-bootcamp-challenge-the-entry">I didn't win the Strobist competition</a> (boo!) I have ordered a set of Dean Collins DVDs and am also considering buying a set of "ebay radio slaves" so hopefully soon I will have another "birthday moment" soon, heh.<br /><br />Technorati Tags: <a class="performancingtags" href="http://technorati.com/tag/photography" rel="tag">photography</a>, <a class="performancingtags" href="http://technorati.com/tag/nikon" rel="tag">nikon</a>, <a class="performancingtags" href="http://technorati.com/tag/sb-28" rel="tag">sb-28</a>, <a class="performancingtags" href="http://technorati.com/tag/ebay" rel="tag">ebay</a>, <a class="performancingtags" href="http://technorati.com/tag/moo" rel="tag">moo</a>, <a class="performancingtags" href="http://technorati.com/tag/printing" rel="tag">printing</a>, <a class="performancingtags" href="http://technorati.com/tag/news" rel="tag">news</a><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisgcom/259693741/"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/90/259693741_041daf8432_m.jpg" alt="" hspace="10" width="240" height="160" align="right" /></a>Every day for a couple of weeks has been like my birthday, I have gotten to look forward to the postie arriving every morning to see what he might bring me. This has mainly been because of my (admittedly excessive) eBay activities, but also this morning two special deliveries cheered me right up.</p>
<p>My latest eBay arrival was actually one of my first purchases. Big tip, if you want something quick do not pay by cheque, move on to the next auction where paypal is accepted. I &#8220;won&#8221; this SB-28 flash on the 9th of September, it arrived on the 30th! I will be doing a review of these flashes along with the SB-26 and how they compare to my 580ex soon now I have got some use out of them.</p>
<p>The surprise parcels this morning were my <a href="http://dslrblog.com/blog/chris-garrett/10-free-flickr-minicards">moo cards</a> and my first ever published photograph.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisgcom/259692047/"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/80/259692047_de0af69d38_m.jpg" alt="" hspace="10" width="240" height="216" align="right" /></a>First the moo cards. They are really <em>really</em> nice. I will definitely be buying a set even though I don&#8217;t really have a pressing need for them like Mark.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what the done thing is with these cards, do you just take a random selection of your recent pictures (as I did with the free 10) or choose only your best work (if not your own choice, in who&#8217;s opinion? interestingness?) or is it better to actually <em>design </em>an image to use?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisgcom/259692183/"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/119/259692183_3f4189af92_m.jpg" alt="" hspace="10" width="219" height="240" align="left" /></a>The best parcel has to be the <a href="http://dslrblog.com/blog/chris-garrett/my-good-news-is-strobists-dilemma">British Airways in-flight magazine with my picture in it</a>! For the professionals who see your work in print all the time you will probably think this is really lame but it was quite a moment for me when I opened up this magazine and saw my name under my photograph.<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisgcom/259692330/"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/119/259692330_ed83619417_m.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="160" /></a><br />
Maybe next time someone might be willing to even pay me&#8230;</p>
<p>Seeing as <a href="http://dslrblog.com/blog/chris-garrett/strobist-lighting-bootcamp-challenge-the-entry">I didn&#8217;t win the Strobist competition</a> (boo!) I have ordered a set of Dean Collins DVDs and am also considering buying a set of &#8220;ebay radio slaves&#8221; so hopefully soon I will have another &#8220;birthday moment&#8221; soon, heh.</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/photography">photography</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/nikon">nikon</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/sb-28">sb-28</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/ebay">ebay</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/moo">moo</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/printing">printing</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/news">news</a><br />
<!--break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/dslrblog-updates-in-the-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC Ripping Off Flickr Photographers?</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/bbc-ripping-off-flickr-photographers/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/bbc-ripping-off-flickr-photographers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues, Ethics, Model Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protecting Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photographers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems the venerable bastion of public-funded media, "Auntie" BBC, is being a bit naughty when it comes to sourcing photography from Flickr users according to <a href="http://www.epuk.org/Blogs/361/pimp-my-auntie">Editorial Photographers UK</a><br /> <blockquote>Mark’s or Sparks’ clever wheeze was to sign up with the photo sharing site, then attempt to persuade his new friends to hand over their work to the Beeb – for free naturally. Of course there’s nothing new in cheapskate editors scouring Flickr for freebies. And the Beeb has excelled in its pursuit of license payers for free content for its viewers’ galleries, all under the terms of an infamous contract that allows the BBC to earn money from the pictures while placing any uncomfortable legal repercussions firmly on the contributor.  But the Sparks scam has a whole new spin to it. He doesn’t just want pictures for the viewers’ gallery; nor is he asking if he can use existing material to illustrate BBC stories. He wants people to agree to give him unfettered access to all future material that might be posted on Flickr, thereby creating a constantly updated pool of images that the BBC could access at any time for free, and of course resell at a profit. A picture library for free in fact.</blockquote><br /><br />.. it seems also they are not above just taking what they want either ...<br /><br /> <blockquote>But oh dear, <a target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/south_of_scotland/5241970.stm" rel="external">what’s this then</a>? Why, it’s a picture lifted without permission and used on the BBC Scotland news website! It’s not as if Sparks and Co couldn’t have asked. The original image had an almost indecent amount of copyright and contact information, not only in Photoshop’s File Info, but underneath it on the website where it was first published. Presumably BBC Scotland work at such a fast pace they simply can’t keep up with the number of pictures they lift without permission.</blockquote><br /><br />You can see how a photographer would be flattered and would be willing to offer up their work just for the portfolio/resume potential and bragging rights. The BBC though should be above this kind of thing, they should be leading the way in fair treatment of the public as they are supposed to be there to <i>serve</i> the public. They will get nowhere arguing they are under funded, they are certainly well funded in comparison to other media outlets who do pay and are not propped up by a television tax.<br /><br />Personally I see nothing wrong with the BBC asking for free contributions. The pictures are submitted voluntarily after all. They just need to get their legal people to be a bit more fair with what they have people agreeing to. <p /> 

See the full discussion at <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/scots/discuss/72157594242303065/">flickr here</a>

<br /><br />Technorati Tags: <a class="performancingtags" href="http://technorati.com/tag/bbc" rel="tag">bbc</a>, <a class="performancingtags" href="http://technorati.com/tag/photography" rel="tag">photography</a>, <a class="performancingtags" href="http://technorati.com/tag/scandal" rel="tag">scandal</a>, <a class="performancingtags" href="http://technorati.com/tag/media" rel="tag">media</a>, <a class="performancingtags" href="http://technorati.com/tag/copyright" rel="tag">copyright</a>, <a class="performancingtags" href="http://technorati.com/tag/photographers" rel="tag">photographers</a>, <a class="performancingtags" href="http://technorati.com/tag/law" rel="tag">law</a>, <a class="performancingtags" href="http://technorati.com/tag/rights" rel="tag">rights</a>, <a class="performancingtags" href="http://technorati.com/tag/news" rel="tag">news</a>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems the venerable bastion of public-funded media, &#8220;Auntie&#8221; BBC, is being a bit naughty when it comes to sourcing photography from Flickr users according to <a href="http://www.epuk.org/Blogs/361/pimp-my-auntie">Editorial Photographers UK</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Mark’s or Sparks’ clever wheeze was to sign up with the photo sharing site, then attempt to persuade his new friends to hand over their work to the Beeb – for free naturally. Of course there’s nothing new in cheapskate editors scouring Flickr for freebies. And the Beeb has excelled in its pursuit of license payers for free content for its viewers’ galleries, all under the terms of an infamous contract that allows the BBC to earn money from the pictures while placing any uncomfortable legal repercussions firmly on the contributor.  But the Sparks scam has a whole new spin to it. He doesn’t just want pictures for the viewers’ gallery; nor is he asking if he can use existing material to illustrate BBC stories. He wants people to agree to give him unfettered access to all future material that might be posted on Flickr, thereby creating a constantly updated pool of images that the BBC could access at any time for free, and of course resell at a profit. A picture library for free in fact.</p></blockquote>
<p>.. it seems also they are not above just taking what they want either &#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>But oh dear, <a rel="external" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/south_of_scotland/5241970.stm" target="_blank">what’s this then</a>? Why, it’s a picture lifted without permission and used on the BBC Scotland news website! It’s not as if Sparks and Co couldn’t have asked. The original image had an almost indecent amount of copyright and contact information, not only in Photoshop’s File Info, but underneath it on the website where it was first published. Presumably BBC Scotland work at such a fast pace they simply can’t keep up with the number of pictures they lift without permission.</p></blockquote>
<p>You can see how a photographer would be flattered and would be willing to offer up their work just for the portfolio/resume potential and bragging rights. The BBC though should be above this kind of thing, they should be leading the way in fair treatment of the public as they are supposed to be there to <em>serve</em> the public. They will get nowhere arguing they are under funded, they are certainly well funded in comparison to other media outlets who do pay and are not propped up by a television tax.</p>
<p>Personally I see nothing wrong with the BBC asking for free contributions. The pictures are submitted voluntarily after all. They just need to get their legal people to be a bit more fair with what they have people agreeing to.</p>
<p>See the full discussion at <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/scots/discuss/72157594242303065/">flickr here</a></p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/bbc">bbc</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/photography">photography</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/scandal">scandal</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/media">media</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/copyright">copyright</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/photographers">photographers</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/law">law</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/rights">rights</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/news">news</a><br />
<!--break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/bbc-ripping-off-flickr-photographers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Picasa Easter Egg</title>
		<link>http://dslrblog.com/picasa-easter-egg/</link>
		<comments>http://dslrblog.com/picasa-easter-egg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 20:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Photography Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Easter Egg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picasa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;">
 <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisgcom/249982857/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/92/249982857_1614b7c47e_m.jpg" alt="" style="border: solid 2px #000000;" /></a>
 <br />
 <span style="font-size: 0.9em; margin-top: 0px;">
  <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisgcom/249982857/">Picasa Easter Egg</a>
  <br />
  Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/chrisgcom/">chrisgarrett</a>.
 </span>
</div>
Those Google guys <i>do</i> have a sense of humour!<br />
<br />
Open up Picasa 2.5, hit Ctrl + Shift + Y to see a teddy bear.<br />
<br />
Source: <a href="http://www.adidap.com/2006/09/21/picasa-25-easter-egg/">Adidap</a>
<br clear="all" />
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;"><a title="photo sharing" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisgcom/249982857/"><img style="border: solid 2px #000000;" src="http://static.flickr.com/92/249982857_1614b7c47e_m.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 0.9em; margin-top: 0px;"><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisgcom/249982857/">Picasa Easter Egg</a></p>
<p>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/chrisgcom/">chrisgarrett</a>.<br />
</span></div>
<p>Those Google guys <em>do</em> have a sense of humour!</p>
<p>Open up Picasa 2.5, hit Ctrl + Shift + Y to see a teddy bear.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.adidap.com/2006/09/21/picasa-25-easter-egg/">Adidap</a></p>
<p><!--break--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dslrblog.com/picasa-easter-egg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
